All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexey Klimov <aklimov-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org,
	yury.norov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org,
	jobaker-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	audralmitchel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org,
	gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	rafael-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	qais.yousef-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	klimov.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpu/hotplug: wait for cpuset_hotplug_work to finish on cpu onlining
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:41:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tuqhrs3d.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210212003032.2037750-1-aklimov-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Alexey Klimov <aklimov-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> writes:
> int cpu_device_up(struct device *dev)

Yeah, definitely better to do the wait here.

>  int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
>  {
> -	int cpu, ret = 0;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	cpumask_var_t mask;
> +	int cpu, ret;
> +
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	ret = 0;
>  	cpu_maps_update_begin();
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>  		if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
> @@ -2099,18 +2098,35 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
>  		 * called under the sysfs hotplug lock, so it is properly
>  		 * serialized against the regular offline usage.
>  		 */
> -		cpuhp_offline_cpu_device(cpu);
> +		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> +		dev->offline = true;
> +
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
>  	}
>  	if (!ret)
>  		cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
>  	cpu_maps_update_done();
> +
> +	/* Tell user space about the state changes */
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
> +		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> +		kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_OFFLINE);
> +	}
> +
> +	free_cpumask_var(mask);
>  	return ret;
>  }

Hrm, should the dev manipulation be kept in one place, something like
this?

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 8817ccdc8e112..aa21219a7b7c4 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -2085,11 +2085,20 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
 		ret = cpu_down_maps_locked(cpu, CPUHP_OFFLINE);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
+
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
+	}
+	if (!ret)
+		cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
+	cpu_maps_update_done();
+
+	/* Tell user space about the state changes */
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
 		/*
-		 * As this needs to hold the cpu maps lock it's impossible
+		 * When the cpu maps lock was taken above it was impossible
 		 * to call device_offline() because that ends up calling
 		 * cpu_down() which takes cpu maps lock. cpu maps lock
-		 * needs to be held as this might race against in kernel
+		 * needed to be held as this might race against in kernel
 		 * abusers of the hotplug machinery (thermal management).
 		 *
 		 * So nothing would update device:offline state. That would
@@ -2100,16 +2109,6 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
 		 */
 		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
 		dev->offline = true;
-
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
-	}
-	if (!ret)
-		cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
-	cpu_maps_update_done();
-
-	/* Tell user space about the state changes */
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
-		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
 		kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_OFFLINE);
 	}
 
@@ -2136,9 +2135,6 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
 		ret = _cpu_up(cpu, 0, CPUHP_ONLINE);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
-		/* See comment in cpuhp_smt_disable() */
-		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
-		dev->offline = false;
 
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
 	}
@@ -2152,7 +2148,9 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
 
 	/* Tell user space about the state changes */
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+		/* See comment in cpuhp_smt_disable() */
 		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+		dev->offline = false;
 		kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_ONLINE);
 	}
 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
To: Alexey Klimov <aklimov@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, yury.norov@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	jobaker@redhat.com, audralmitchel@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	qais.yousef@arm.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, klimov.linux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpu/hotplug: wait for cpuset_hotplug_work to finish on cpu onlining
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:41:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tuqhrs3d.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210212003032.2037750-1-aklimov@redhat.com>

Alexey Klimov <aklimov@redhat.com> writes:
> int cpu_device_up(struct device *dev)

Yeah, definitely better to do the wait here.

>  int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
>  {
> -	int cpu, ret = 0;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	cpumask_var_t mask;
> +	int cpu, ret;
> +
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	ret = 0;
>  	cpu_maps_update_begin();
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>  		if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
> @@ -2099,18 +2098,35 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
>  		 * called under the sysfs hotplug lock, so it is properly
>  		 * serialized against the regular offline usage.
>  		 */
> -		cpuhp_offline_cpu_device(cpu);
> +		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> +		dev->offline = true;
> +
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
>  	}
>  	if (!ret)
>  		cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
>  	cpu_maps_update_done();
> +
> +	/* Tell user space about the state changes */
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
> +		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> +		kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_OFFLINE);
> +	}
> +
> +	free_cpumask_var(mask);
>  	return ret;
>  }

Hrm, should the dev manipulation be kept in one place, something like
this?

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 8817ccdc8e112..aa21219a7b7c4 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -2085,11 +2085,20 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
 		ret = cpu_down_maps_locked(cpu, CPUHP_OFFLINE);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
+
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
+	}
+	if (!ret)
+		cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
+	cpu_maps_update_done();
+
+	/* Tell user space about the state changes */
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
 		/*
-		 * As this needs to hold the cpu maps lock it's impossible
+		 * When the cpu maps lock was taken above it was impossible
 		 * to call device_offline() because that ends up calling
 		 * cpu_down() which takes cpu maps lock. cpu maps lock
-		 * needs to be held as this might race against in kernel
+		 * needed to be held as this might race against in kernel
 		 * abusers of the hotplug machinery (thermal management).
 		 *
 		 * So nothing would update device:offline state. That would
@@ -2100,16 +2109,6 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
 		 */
 		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
 		dev->offline = true;
-
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
-	}
-	if (!ret)
-		cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
-	cpu_maps_update_done();
-
-	/* Tell user space about the state changes */
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
-		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
 		kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_OFFLINE);
 	}
 
@@ -2136,9 +2135,6 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
 		ret = _cpu_up(cpu, 0, CPUHP_ONLINE);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
-		/* See comment in cpuhp_smt_disable() */
-		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
-		dev->offline = false;
 
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
 	}
@@ -2152,7 +2148,9 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
 
 	/* Tell user space about the state changes */
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+		/* See comment in cpuhp_smt_disable() */
 		dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+		dev->offline = false;
 		kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_ONLINE);
 	}
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-12 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-12  0:30 [PATCH v2] cpu/hotplug: wait for cpuset_hotplug_work to finish on cpu onlining Alexey Klimov
2021-02-12  0:30 ` Alexey Klimov
     [not found] ` <20210212003032.2037750-1-aklimov-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2021-02-12 19:41   ` Daniel Jordan [this message]
2021-02-12 19:41     ` Daniel Jordan
2021-03-16  3:15     ` Alexey Klimov
     [not found]       ` <CAFBcO+99Ax5MuOtzNx=NrmnUN=+913Sc-DV83ObOi01A=kkN3w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2021-03-18 19:12         ` Daniel Jordan
2021-03-18 19:12           ` Daniel Jordan
2021-02-16 18:29   ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-16 18:29     ` Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tuqhrs3d.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=daniel.m.jordan-qhclzuegtsvqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=aklimov-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=audralmitchel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jobaker-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=klimov.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rafael-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=yury.norov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.