From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_l
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:42:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87twf2qm4u.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUU2Q7e5rthM9+ydPM5EtROufY1wVmg-MvKwGbPq=o3a0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 02 Aug 2016, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see the below call-trace with latest d-i-n, guess latest linux-next
>>
>> FWIW, "d-i-n" is ambiguous (drm-intel-next vs. drm-intel-nightly) and we
>> don't use that ourselves.
>>
>
> Oh, sorry with d-i-n I meant drm-intel-nightly.
> Normally, I also point to the "integration manifest"
> like...drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-02d-14h-10m-12s UTC integration
> manifest.
> You do not test d-i-n yourself?
> Strange.
We do not use the *acronym* "d-i-n" ourselves because it is
ambiguous. drm-intel-nightly is our main test target.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || __blocking_notifier_call_chain
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:42:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87twf2qm4u.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUU2Q7e5rthM9+ydPM5EtROufY1wVmg-MvKwGbPq=o3a0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 02 Aug 2016, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see the below call-trace with latest d-i-n, guess latest linux-next
>>
>> FWIW, "d-i-n" is ambiguous (drm-intel-next vs. drm-intel-nightly) and we
>> don't use that ourselves.
>>
>
> Oh, sorry with d-i-n I meant drm-intel-nightly.
> Normally, I also point to the "integration manifest"
> like...drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-02d-14h-10m-12s UTC integration
> manifest.
> You do not test d-i-n yourself?
> Strange.
We do not use the *acronym* "d-i-n" ourselves because it is
ambiguous. drm-intel-nightly is our main test target.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 6:00 [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || __blocking_notifier_call_chain Sedat Dilek
2016-07-15 8:40 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || Chris Wilson
2016-07-15 8:40 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || __blocking_notifier_call_chain Chris Wilson
2016-07-15 10:37 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || Sedat Dilek
2016-07-15 10:37 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || __blocking_notifier_call_chain Sedat Dilek
2016-07-15 21:10 ` Sedat Dilek
2016-08-17 19:27 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || Sedat Dilek
2016-08-17 19:27 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || __blocking_notifier_call_chain Sedat Dilek
2016-08-17 19:36 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || Johannes Berg
2016-08-17 19:36 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || __blocking_notifier_call_chain Johannes Berg
2016-08-17 20:29 ` Sedat Dilek
2016-08-01 13:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_l Jani Nikula
2016-08-01 13:33 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || __blocking_notifier_call_chain Jani Nikula
2016-08-02 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_l Sedat Dilek
2016-08-02 17:47 ` [drm-intel-nightly] 2016y-07m-14d-21h-13m-02s UTC: locking dependency: drm_modeset_lock_all() || __blocking_notifier_call_chain Sedat Dilek
2016-08-02 19:56 ` Sedat Dilek
2016-08-03 8:42 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2016-08-03 8:42 ` Jani Nikula
2016-08-03 5:16 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87twf2qm4u.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.