hammer backports v0.94.3 and toward v0.94.4

hammer backports v0.94.3 and toward v0.94.4

[Loic Dachary]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 874 bytes --]

Hi Abhishek,

I'll be on vacation from august 17th to august 28th included. Yuri just told me today that he is about 60% done with the testing of v0.94.3 and did not find anything that suggests we're in trouble. So far ;-) There is a good chance that he completes testing while I'm away. If a blocker needs my attention, feel free to send me a mail (I'll check daily) and I'll make myself available to help.

Abhishek Varshney has made excellent progress learning the various procedures and he is now about to create a new issue for the upcoming v0.94.4 ( https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5571#issuecomment-130810176 ). It would be great if you have time to answer his questions so he is not blocked. If you don't have time for this extra workload, we can find an alternate solution.

Am I missing something ?

Cheers
-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: hammer backports v0.94.3 and toward v0.94.4

[Abhishek L]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Loic Dachary writes:

> Hi Abhishek,
>
> I'll be on vacation from august 17th to august 28th included. Yuri just told me today that he is about 60% done with the testing of v0.94.3 and did not find anything that suggests we're in trouble. So far ;-) There is a good chance that he completes testing while I'm away. If a blocker needs my attention, feel free to send me a mail (I'll check daily) and I'll make myself available to help.

Sure

> Abhishek Varshney has made excellent progress learning the various procedures and he is now about to create a new issue for the upcoming v0.94.4 ( https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5571#issuecomment-130810176 ). It would be great if you have time to answer his questions so he is not blocked. If you don't have time for this extra workload, we can find an alternate solution.

No problems, I'll be around.

>
> Am I missing something ?
>
> Cheers

- -- 
Abhishek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVzYXJAAoJEPnwZB8bZe1fRrIIAKDqeT51h/dBBBEURSMFwEmN
TWVYH6g1eB/HkMxDu8XsPg17OYJCGsap/roddlctGYrI2t8BvA9IHU8SNGsmywZl
WrSEMWvxWx4WGx4vPbhMU8vwRSI+CfJD+Je7VBQOjgqF2ze31o8FO2x/EOFSytqm
IAPuRI2h4E9Tm7XCI9rtZBRghnfcnbVP79jotl1d6Pe9jmAowmgGSuvVddowcCIK
MtvXDAERLSg90wfqIX04NsMGd8dh1/JGX2s/R/s5Nu26W6Io5O/K/dHt6nZfnlFP
oWYv7SUZGGWYnMmiXXSrhizqjWlhxQiQC/o/Bq0tM039Rpw6ST3iP+tMVRsGpsU=
=/CUB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----