From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Joe Woodward <jw@terrafix.co.uk>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
t-kristo@ti.com, govindraj.r@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DSS2/PM on 3.2 broken?
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:22:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ty3rql2q.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120120080508.0dc0c758@notabene.brown> (NeilBrown's message of "Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:05:08 +1100")
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> writes:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:37:39 -0800 Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> "Joe Woodward" <jw@terrafix.co.uk> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > If I do (either from the console or via a button press on the screen)
>> > then I never get a SYNC_LOST.
>> >
>> > echo 0 > /sys/devices/omapdss/display0/enabled
>> > echo 1 > /sys/devices/omapdss/display0/enabled
>> >
>> > Just trying to think of some ideas that may be affecting the DSS...
>> > - Could it to be to do with the GPIO being used as a wake source (i.e. does the GPIO driver do runtime_pm properly?)?
>> > - Could it to be to do with the UART as it seems to fix itself whenever a character is pressed?
>> > - Could it to be to do with the ordering in which drivers are resumed?
>>
>> Here's my guess/hunch as to why the UART wakeup helps and GPIO doesn't.
>>
>> The UART's are idled using timeouts, so after any activity (including a
>> wakeup) the UART timeout will not alow the UARTs to idle (and thus the
>> system to hit low power states) for a given timeout period.
>
> While I agree with that, I'm wondering if there might be something else odd
> relating to the UARTs that we haven't spotted yet.
I suspect the problem for both is constraints that aren't stated
explicitly.
> I'm chasing done the different problem of HDQ not coping with CPUIDLE but I
> think it is very likely to have a similar root cause, as HDQ goes wrong at
> the same time that DSS goes wrong, and is a vaguely similar way.
>
> I just tried compiling omap_hwmod.c with "#define DEBUG" and got some strange
> results.
Strange indeed.
I assume you are you using the runtime PM converted driver from Paul? I
tried that branch on my 3530/Overo (console on UART3) and didn't see any
nul's on my UART3 console.
[...]
> The other thing I discovered is that when I set the uart 'sleep_timeout' to 5
> (all uarts) so that CPUIDLE can let CORE enter the lower power states, I get
> a fairly steady stream of:
>
> [ 1168.490478] omap_hwmod: uart1: enabling
> [ 1168.490509] omap_hwmod: uart1: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.490539] omap_hwmod: uart2: enabling
> [ 1168.490539] omap_hwmod: uart2: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.490631] omap_hwmod: uart3: enabling
> [ 1168.490661] omap_hwmod: uart3: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.490661] omap_hwmod: uart4: enabling
> [ 1168.490692] omap_hwmod: uart4: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.578796] omap_hwmod: uart3: idling
> [ 1168.578796] omap_hwmod: uart3: disabling clocks
> [ 1168.578826] omap_hwmod: uart4: idling
> [ 1168.578826] omap_hwmod: uart4: disabling clocks
> [ 1168.578857] omap_hwmod: uart1: idling
> [ 1168.578857] omap_hwmod: uart1: disabling clocks
> [ 1168.578887] omap_hwmod: uart2: idling
> [ 1168.578887] omap_hwmod: uart2: disabling clocks
> [ 1168.714263] omap_hwmod: uart1: enabling
> [ 1168.714294] omap_hwmod: uart1: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.714324] omap_hwmod: uart2: enabling
> [ 1168.714324] omap_hwmod: uart2: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.714416] omap_hwmod: uart3: enabling
> [ 1168.714447] omap_hwmod: uart3: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.714447] omap_hwmod: uart4: enabling
> [ 1168.714477] omap_hwmod: uart4: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.803344] omap_hwmod: uart3: idling
> [ 1168.803344] omap_hwmod: uart3: disabling clocks
> [ 1168.803375] omap_hwmod: uart4: idling
> [ 1168.803375] omap_hwmod: uart4: disabling clocks
> [ 1168.851257] omap_hwmod: uart3: enabling
> [ 1168.851287] omap_hwmod: uart3: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.851318] omap_hwmod: uart4: enabling
> [ 1168.851318] omap_hwmod: uart4: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.885955] omap_hwmod: uart3: idling
> [ 1168.885986] omap_hwmod: uart3: disabling clocks
> [ 1168.885986] omap_hwmod: uart4: idling
> [ 1168.886016] omap_hwmod: uart4: disabling clocks
> [ 1168.886383] omap_hwmod: uart3: enabling
> [ 1168.886383] omap_hwmod: uart3: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.886383] omap_hwmod: uart4: enabling
> [ 1168.886413] omap_hwmod: uart4: enabling clocks
> [ 1168.944885] omap_hwmod: uart3: idling
> [ 1168.944915] omap_hwmod: uart3: disabling clocks
At least this part is expected.
In the kernel you're using the UART clocks are enabled/disabled during
the idle path depending on the low-power state being targetted, so would
expect to see lots of UART clock gating going on.
Kevin
> It seems to mostly be uart3 and uart4.
> If there is any interaction between the uart clock and the hdq clock, this
> could explain why the HDQ gets confused when all this is happening.
>
> And if there is a connection there, then there could also be a connection
> with a DSS clock which could be confusing it.
>
> I admit this is largely surmise and hypothesis - but there is definitely
> something odd here!
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-20 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-09 12:46 DSS2/PM on 3.2 broken? Joe Woodward
2012-01-09 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-10 9:58 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 13:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-11 14:22 ` Archit
2012-01-11 15:15 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 15:52 ` Archit
2012-01-11 16:13 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 16:54 ` Archit
2012-01-12 9:28 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12 9:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12 9:51 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-11 22:59 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 10:05 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 11:20 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 11:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:09 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 23:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-17 21:24 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-22 0:07 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-22 11:30 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-24 10:37 ` OMAP HDQ: was " NeilBrown
2012-01-26 14:19 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-27 22:35 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-27 22:58 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-28 0:40 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-28 6:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-01 7:51 ` NeilBrown
2012-02-01 18:36 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-18 7:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-18 11:15 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-18 11:42 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-18 20:30 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-19 10:17 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 10:40 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 11:29 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 11:36 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 12:21 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 14:52 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 19:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-19 21:05 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-20 0:22 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-01-21 12:12 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-23 22:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-25 0:32 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 11:34 ` Govindraj
2012-01-13 13:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 19:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13 22:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13 23:06 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:34 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-14 1:17 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-14 1:28 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 11:19 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-11 13:32 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-12 16:42 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12 22:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13 5:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-13 19:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-16 11:11 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 19:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-20 7:16 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 18:06 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ty3rql2q.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=govindraj.r@ti.com \
--cc=jw@terrafix.co.uk \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.