* Re: [patch for 2.6.24? 1/1] cpufreq: Initialise default governor before use
[not found] ` <20080114091401.GB8026@elte.hu>
@ 2008-01-16 15:17 ` Johannes Weiner
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Johannes Weiner @ 2008-01-16 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: akpm, davej, rjw, tglx, venkatesh.pallipadi, linux-kernel
Hi,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
> * akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
>> +fs_initcall(cpufreq_gov_dbs_init);
>> +#else
>> module_init(cpufreq_gov_dbs_init);
>> +#endif
>
> silly question: why not unconditional fs_initcall() ?
Would there be a way to avoid the fs_initcall at all?
Otherwise, this is just a psychological thing to show, hey, this still
sucks, find a better solution. But perhaps the plain fs_initcall is
marker enough for that fact.
Hannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-01-16 15:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200801140906.m0E962IL020530@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20080114091401.GB8026@elte.hu>
2008-01-16 15:17 ` [patch for 2.6.24? 1/1] cpufreq: Initialise default governor before use Johannes Weiner
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.