All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/MSI: Convert pci_msi_ignore_mask to per MSI domain flag
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:20:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7rxzct0.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y0wtzg0z.ffs@tglx>

On Tue, Mar 25 2025 at 09:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 24 2025 at 20:18, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 07:58:14PM +0100, Daniel Gomez wrote:
>>> The issue is that info appears to be uninitialized. So, this worked for me:
>>
>> Indeed, irq_domain->host_data is NULL, there's no msi_domain_info.  As
>> this is x86, I was expecting x86 ot always use
>> x86_init_dev_msi_info(), but that doesn't seem to be the case.  I
>> would like to better understand this.
>
> Indeed. On x86 this should not happen at all. On architectures, which do
> not use (hierarchical) interrupt domains, it will return NULL.
>
> So I really want to understand why this happens on x86 before such a
> "fix" is deployed.

So after staring at it some more it's clear. Without XEN, the domain
returned is the MSI parent domain, which is the vector domain in that
setup. That does not have a domain info set. But on legacy architectures
there is not even a domain.

It's really wonderful that we have a gazillion ways to manage the
backends of PCI/MSI....

So none of the suggested pointer checks will cover it correctly. Though
there is already a function which allows to query MSI domain flags
independent of the underlying insanity. Sorry for not catching it in
review.

Untested patch below.

Thanks,

        tglx
---
 drivers/pci/msi/msi.c |   18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
@@ -285,8 +285,6 @@ static void pci_msi_set_enable(struct pc
 static int msi_setup_msi_desc(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec,
 			      struct irq_affinity_desc *masks)
 {
-	const struct irq_domain *d = dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->dev);
-	const struct msi_domain_info *info = d->host_data;
 	struct msi_desc desc;
 	u16 control;
 
@@ -297,7 +295,7 @@ static int msi_setup_msi_desc(struct pci
 	/* Lies, damned lies, and MSIs */
 	if (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_HAS_MSI_MASKING)
 		control |= PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT;
-	if (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_NO_MASK)
+	if (pci_msi_domain_supports(dev, MSI_FLAG_NO_MASK, DENY_LEGACY))
 		control &= ~PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT;
 
 	desc.nvec_used			= nvec;
@@ -605,20 +603,18 @@ static void __iomem *msix_map_region(str
  */
 void msix_prepare_msi_desc(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc)
 {
-	const struct irq_domain *d = dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->dev);
-	const struct msi_domain_info *info = d->host_data;
-
 	desc->nvec_used				= 1;
 	desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_msix		= 1;
 	desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_64		= 1;
 	desc->pci.msi_attrib.default_irq	= dev->irq;
 	desc->pci.mask_base			= dev->msix_base;
-	desc->pci.msi_attrib.can_mask		= !(info->flags & MSI_FLAG_NO_MASK) &&
-						  !desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual;
 
-	if (desc->pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) {
+
+	if (!pci_msi_domain_supports(dev, MSI_FLAG_NO_MASK, DENY_LEGACY) &&
+	    !desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual) {
 		void __iomem *addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(desc);
 
+		desc->pci.msi_attrib.can_mask = true;
 		desc->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
 	}
 }
@@ -715,8 +711,6 @@ static int msix_setup_interrupts(struct
 static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries,
 				int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
 {
-	const struct irq_domain *d = dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->dev);
-	const struct msi_domain_info *info = d->host_data;
 	int ret, tsize;
 	u16 control;
 
@@ -747,7 +741,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct p
 	/* Disable INTX */
 	pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 0);
 
-	if (!(info->flags & MSI_FLAG_NO_MASK)) {
+	if (!pci_msi_domain_supports(dev, MSI_FLAG_NO_MASK, DENY_LEGACY)) {
 		/*
 		 * Ensure that all table entries are masked to prevent
 		 * stale entries from firing in a crash kernel.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19  9:20 [PATCH v3 0/3] xen: Fix usage of devices behind a VMD bridge Roger Pau Monne
2025-02-19  9:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] xen/pci: Do not register devices with segments >= 0x10000 Roger Pau Monne
2025-02-19  9:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI: vmd: Disable MSI remapping bypass under Xen Roger Pau Monne
2025-03-03 14:16   ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-20 21:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-19  9:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/MSI: Convert pci_msi_ignore_mask to per MSI domain flag Roger Pau Monne
2025-03-20 21:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-21  8:00     ` Jürgen Groß
2025-03-24 14:29       ` Daniel Gomez
2025-03-24 17:51         ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-24 18:58           ` Daniel Gomez
2025-03-24 19:18             ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-24 20:45               ` Daniel Gomez
2025-03-25  8:11               ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-25  9:20                 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-03-25  9:47                   ` Daniel Gomez
2025-03-25 10:22                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-25 10:27                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-25 10:55                       ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-26  8:14                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-26  8:10                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-26 11:26                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-26 12:05                   ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Handle the NOMASK flag correctly for all PCI/MSI backends Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-26 12:09                     ` Jürgen Groß
2025-03-26 12:46                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-26 12:16                     ` Juergen Gross
2025-03-26 14:39                     ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-30 14:57                   ` [PATCH] " Bert Karwatzki
2025-03-26 11:04   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/MSI: Convert pci_msi_ignore_mask to per MSI domain flag Borislav Petkov
2025-03-26 11:14     ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-26 11:21       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-06  8:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] xen: Fix usage of devices behind a VMD bridge Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-20 16:21   ` Roger Pau Monné

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v7rxzct0.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.