From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
"Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/MSI: Convert pci_msi_ignore_mask to per MSI domain flag
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:10:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-O2bwbYFvOzZw0t@macbook.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v7rxzct0.ffs@tglx>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 10:20:43AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25 2025 at 09:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 24 2025 at 20:18, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 07:58:14PM +0100, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> >>> The issue is that info appears to be uninitialized. So, this worked for me:
> >>
> >> Indeed, irq_domain->host_data is NULL, there's no msi_domain_info. As
> >> this is x86, I was expecting x86 ot always use
> >> x86_init_dev_msi_info(), but that doesn't seem to be the case. I
> >> would like to better understand this.
> >
> > Indeed. On x86 this should not happen at all. On architectures, which do
> > not use (hierarchical) interrupt domains, it will return NULL.
> >
> > So I really want to understand why this happens on x86 before such a
> > "fix" is deployed.
>
> So after staring at it some more it's clear. Without XEN, the domain
> returned is the MSI parent domain, which is the vector domain in that
> setup. That does not have a domain info set. But on legacy architectures
> there is not even a domain.
>
> It's really wonderful that we have a gazillion ways to manage the
> backends of PCI/MSI....
>
> So none of the suggested pointer checks will cover it correctly. Though
> there is already a function which allows to query MSI domain flags
> independent of the underlying insanity. Sorry for not catching it in
> review.
>
> Untested patch below.
As I'm getting reports of other people hitting this issue, is there
anything that needs to be done from my side to get the fix into
linux-next?
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 9:20 [PATCH v3 0/3] xen: Fix usage of devices behind a VMD bridge Roger Pau Monne
2025-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] xen/pci: Do not register devices with segments >= 0x10000 Roger Pau Monne
2025-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI: vmd: Disable MSI remapping bypass under Xen Roger Pau Monne
2025-03-03 14:16 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-20 21:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-19 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/MSI: Convert pci_msi_ignore_mask to per MSI domain flag Roger Pau Monne
2025-03-20 21:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-21 8:00 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-03-24 14:29 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-03-24 17:51 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-24 18:58 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-03-24 19:18 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-24 20:45 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-03-25 8:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-25 9:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-25 9:47 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-03-25 10:22 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-25 10:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-25 10:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-26 8:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-26 8:10 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2025-03-26 11:26 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-26 12:05 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Handle the NOMASK flag correctly for all PCI/MSI backends Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-26 12:09 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-03-26 12:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-26 12:16 ` Juergen Gross
2025-03-26 14:39 ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-30 14:57 ` [PATCH] " Bert Karwatzki
2025-03-26 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI/MSI: Convert pci_msi_ignore_mask to per MSI domain flag Borislav Petkov
2025-03-26 11:14 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-26 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-06 8:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] xen: Fix usage of devices behind a VMD bridge Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-20 16:21 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-O2bwbYFvOzZw0t@macbook.local \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.