All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Basant Kumar Dwivedi <Basant.KumarDwivedi@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
	Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Salil Akerkar <Salil.Akerkar@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 25/38] KVM: arm64: Trap SME usage in guest
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:21:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8y86jdg.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ye/sS0jEXnBuumeG@sirena.org.uk>

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:25:47 +0000,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:27:55AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME) && cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_SME))
> 
> > Please drop the IS_ENABLED(). We purposely avoid conditional
> > compilation in KVM in order to avoid bitrot, and the amount of code
> > you save isn't significant. Having a static key is more than enough to
> > avoid runtime costs.
> 
> Sure, I wanted to be extra careful here as this is all in hot paths and
> going to get moved elsewhere when we have real guest support.
> 
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME) && cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_SME) &&
> > > +	    cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_FGT)) {
> > > +		val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HFGRTR_EL2);
> > > +		val &= ~(HFGxTR_EL2_nTPIDR_EL0_MASK |
> > > +			 HFGxTR_EL2_nSMPRI_EL1_MASK);
> > > +		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_HFGRTR_EL2);
> > > +
> > > +		val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HFGWTR_EL2);
> > > +		val &= ~(HFGxTR_EL2_nTPIDR_EL0_MASK |
> > > +			 HFGxTR_EL2_nSMPRI_EL1_MASK);
> > > +		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_HFGWTR_EL2);
> > > +	}
> 
> > If the CPUs do not have FGT, what provides the equivalent trapping?
> 
> Nothing for nVHE mode.

That's what I feared.

> 
> > If FGT is mandatory when SME exists, then you should simplify the
> > condition.
> 
> OK, I'll remove the defensiveness here.  FGT is mandatory from v8.6 and
> SME is a v9 feature so people shouldn't build a SME implementation that
> lacks FGT.

Can you then please make it that SME doesn't get enabled at all if FGT
isn't present? It would also be good to have a clarification in the
architecture that it isn't allowed to build SME without FGT (specially
given that v9.0 is congruent to v8.5, and thus doesn't have FGT).

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>,
	Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
	Salil Akerkar <Salil.Akerkar@arm.com>,
	Basant Kumar Dwivedi <Basant.KumarDwivedi@arm.com>,
	Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 25/38] KVM: arm64: Trap SME usage in guest
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:21:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8y86jdg.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ye/sS0jEXnBuumeG@sirena.org.uk>

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:25:47 +0000,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:27:55AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME) && cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_SME))
> 
> > Please drop the IS_ENABLED(). We purposely avoid conditional
> > compilation in KVM in order to avoid bitrot, and the amount of code
> > you save isn't significant. Having a static key is more than enough to
> > avoid runtime costs.
> 
> Sure, I wanted to be extra careful here as this is all in hot paths and
> going to get moved elsewhere when we have real guest support.
> 
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME) && cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_SME) &&
> > > +	    cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_FGT)) {
> > > +		val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HFGRTR_EL2);
> > > +		val &= ~(HFGxTR_EL2_nTPIDR_EL0_MASK |
> > > +			 HFGxTR_EL2_nSMPRI_EL1_MASK);
> > > +		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_HFGRTR_EL2);
> > > +
> > > +		val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HFGWTR_EL2);
> > > +		val &= ~(HFGxTR_EL2_nTPIDR_EL0_MASK |
> > > +			 HFGxTR_EL2_nSMPRI_EL1_MASK);
> > > +		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_HFGWTR_EL2);
> > > +	}
> 
> > If the CPUs do not have FGT, what provides the equivalent trapping?
> 
> Nothing for nVHE mode.

That's what I feared.

> 
> > If FGT is mandatory when SME exists, then you should simplify the
> > condition.
> 
> OK, I'll remove the defensiveness here.  FGT is mandatory from v8.6 and
> SME is a v9 feature so people shouldn't build a SME implementation that
> lacks FGT.

Can you then please make it that SME doesn't get enabled at all if FGT
isn't present? It would also be good to have a clarification in the
architecture that it isn't allowed to build SME without FGT (specially
given that v9.0 is congruent to v8.5, and thus doesn't have FGT).

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>,
	Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
	Salil Akerkar <Salil.Akerkar@arm.com>,
	Basant Kumar Dwivedi <Basant.KumarDwivedi@arm.com>,
	Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 25/38] KVM: arm64: Trap SME usage in guest
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 13:21:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8y86jdg.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ye/sS0jEXnBuumeG@sirena.org.uk>

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:25:47 +0000,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:27:55AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME) && cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_SME))
> 
> > Please drop the IS_ENABLED(). We purposely avoid conditional
> > compilation in KVM in order to avoid bitrot, and the amount of code
> > you save isn't significant. Having a static key is more than enough to
> > avoid runtime costs.
> 
> Sure, I wanted to be extra careful here as this is all in hot paths and
> going to get moved elsewhere when we have real guest support.
> 
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SME) && cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_SME) &&
> > > +	    cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_FGT)) {
> > > +		val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HFGRTR_EL2);
> > > +		val &= ~(HFGxTR_EL2_nTPIDR_EL0_MASK |
> > > +			 HFGxTR_EL2_nSMPRI_EL1_MASK);
> > > +		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_HFGRTR_EL2);
> > > +
> > > +		val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HFGWTR_EL2);
> > > +		val &= ~(HFGxTR_EL2_nTPIDR_EL0_MASK |
> > > +			 HFGxTR_EL2_nSMPRI_EL1_MASK);
> > > +		write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_HFGWTR_EL2);
> > > +	}
> 
> > If the CPUs do not have FGT, what provides the equivalent trapping?
> 
> Nothing for nVHE mode.

That's what I feared.

> 
> > If FGT is mandatory when SME exists, then you should simplify the
> > condition.
> 
> OK, I'll remove the defensiveness here.  FGT is mandatory from v8.6 and
> SME is a v9 feature so people shouldn't build a SME implementation that
> lacks FGT.

Can you then please make it that SME doesn't get enabled at all if FGT
isn't present? It would also be good to have a clarification in the
architecture that it isn't allowed to build SME without FGT (specially
given that v9.0 is congruent to v8.5, and thus doesn't have FGT).

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-25 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 154+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25  0:10 [PATCH v8 00/38] arm64/sme: Initial support for the Scalable Matrix Extension Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 01/38] arm64: cpufeature: Always specify and use a field width for capabilities Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 10:57   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-01-25 10:57     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-01-25 10:57     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-01-25 12:10     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:10       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:10       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 02/38] arm64: Add feature detection for fine grained traps Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 03/38] kselftest/arm64: Remove local ARRAY_SIZE() definitions Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 04/38] arm64/sme: Provide ABI documentation for SME Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 05/38] arm64/sme: System register and exception syndrome definitions Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 11:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 11:25     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 11:25     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 12:15     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:15       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:15       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 06/38] arm64/sme: Manually encode SME instructions Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 07/38] arm64/sme: Early CPU setup for SME Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 08/38] arm64/sme: Basic enumeration support Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 09/38] arm64/sme: Identify supported SME vector lengths at boot Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 10/38] arm64/sme: Implement sysctl to set the default vector length Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 11/38] arm64/sme: Implement vector length configuration prctl()s Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 12/38] arm64/sme: Implement support for TPIDR2 Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 13/38] arm64/sme: Implement SVCR context switching Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 14/38] arm64/sme: Implement streaming SVE " Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 15/38] arm64/sme: Implement ZA " Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 16/38] arm64/sme: Implement traps and syscall handling for SME Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 17/38] arm64/sme: Disable ZA and streaming mode when handling signals Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 18/38] arm64/sme: Implement streaming SVE signal handling Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 19/38] arm64/sme: Implement ZA " Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 20/38] arm64/sme: Implement ptrace support for streaming mode SVE registers Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 21/38] arm64/sme: Add ptrace support for ZA Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 22/38] arm64/sme: Disable streaming mode and ZA when flushing CPU state Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10 ` [PATCH v8 23/38] arm64/sme: Save and restore streaming mode over EFI runtime calls Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:10   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 24/38] KVM: arm64: Hide SME system registers from guests Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 25/38] KVM: arm64: Trap SME usage in guest Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 11:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 11:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 11:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 12:25     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:25       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:25       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 13:21       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-01-25 13:21         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 13:21         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 14:25         ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 14:25           ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 14:25           ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:29   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 26/38] KVM: arm64: Handle SME host state when running guests Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 11:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 11:59     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 11:59     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 12:52     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:52       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 12:52       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 13:22       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 13:22         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 13:22         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-25 13:34         ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 13:34           ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 13:34           ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 27/38] arm64/sme: Provide Kconfig for SME Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 28/38] kselftest/arm64: sme: Add streaming SME support to vlset Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 29/38] kselftest/arm64: Add tests for TPIDR2 Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 30/38] kselftest/arm64: Extend vector configuration API tests to cover SME Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 31/38] kselftest/arm64: sme: Provide streaming mode SVE stress test Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 32/38] kselftest/arm64: signal: Allow tests to be incompatible with features Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 33/38] kselftest/arm64: signal: Handle ZA signal context in core code Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 34/38] kselftest/arm64: Add stress test for SME ZA context switching Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 35/38] kselftest/arm64: signal: Add SME signal handling tests Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 36/38] kselftest/arm64: Add streaming SVE to SVE ptrace tests Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 37/38] kselftest/arm64: Add coverage for the ZA ptrace interface Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 38/38] kselftest/arm64: Add SME support to syscall ABI test Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:11   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v8y86jdg.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Basant.KumarDwivedi@arm.com \
    --cc=Salil.Akerkar@arm.com \
    --cc=alan.hayward@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.