From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sebastia
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:18:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v90hjg7r.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2BXefTw68yoZ9U0F=ASC3=EZDc5PDQCJ16MmXtynd59g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 24 2021 at 15:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wireup futex_waitv syscall for all remaining archs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> I double-checked that futex_waitv() doesn't need any architecture specific
> hacks, and that the list above is complete.
>
> Should I take this through the asm-generic tree, or would you send it
> through the tip tree?
Feel free to pick it up.
Thanks,
tglx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:18:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v90hjg7r.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2BXefTw68yoZ9U0F=ASC3=EZDc5PDQCJ16MmXtynd59g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 24 2021 at 15:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wireup futex_waitv syscall for all remaining archs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> I double-checked that futex_waitv() doesn't need any architecture specific
> hacks, and that the list above is complete.
>
> Should I take this through the asm-generic tree, or would you send it
> through the tip tree?
Feel free to pick it up.
Thanks,
tglx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:18:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v90hjg7r.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2BXefTw68yoZ9U0F=ASC3=EZDc5PDQCJ16MmXtynd59g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 24 2021 at 15:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wireup futex_waitv syscall for all remaining archs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> I double-checked that futex_waitv() doesn't need any architecture specific
> hacks, and that the list above is complete.
>
> Should I take this through the asm-generic tree, or would you send it
> through the tip tree?
Feel free to pick it up.
Thanks,
tglx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT \(xtensa\)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:18:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v90hjg7r.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2BXefTw68yoZ9U0F=ASC3=EZDc5PDQCJ16MmXtynd59g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 24 2021 at 15:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Wireup futex_waitv syscall for all remaining archs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@collabora.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> I double-checked that futex_waitv() doesn't need any architecture specific
> hacks, and that the list above is complete.
>
> Should I take this through the asm-generic tree, or would you send it
> through the tip tree?
Feel free to pick it up.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 11:38 spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' Naresh Kamboju
2021-11-23 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-23 14:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-23 14:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-23 16:07 ` [PATCH] locking: Fixup write_lock_nested() implementation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-23 17:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-23 22:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-24 10:01 ` spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' Rob Landley
2021-11-24 10:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 7:31 ` Rob Landley
2021-11-24 7:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 13:15 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall André Almeida
2021-11-24 13:21 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 13:21 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 13:21 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 13:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-24 13:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-24 13:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-24 13:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-24 14:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 14:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 14:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 14:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 15:56 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 15:56 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 15:56 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 15:56 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 23:18 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-11-24 23:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-24 23:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-24 23:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-24 17:23 ` Max Filippov
2021-11-24 17:23 ` Max Filippov
2021-11-24 17:23 ` Max Filippov
2021-11-24 17:23 ` Max Filippov
2021-11-24 23:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-11-24 23:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-11-24 23:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-11-24 23:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-11-24 23:38 ` spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' Rob Landley
2021-11-25 7:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-25 12:10 ` Rob Landley
2021-11-26 23:51 ` Stafford Horne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v90hjg7r.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@collabora.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.