From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@gmail.com>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Use mmap to add PROT_BTI instead of mprotect [BZ #26831]
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:34:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9embufl.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5eaa74cb7538382b2fd2439755386ac68f7c8db.1604393169.git.szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> (Szabolcs Nagy's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:26:29 +0000")
* Szabolcs Nagy:
> Re-mmap executable segments if possible instead of using mprotect
> to add PROT_BTI. This allows using BTI protection with security
> policies that prevent mprotect with PROT_EXEC.
>
> If the fd of the ELF module is not available because it was kernel
> mapped then mprotect is used and failures are ignored. It is
> expected that linux kernel will add PROT_BTI when mapping a module
> (current linux as of version 5.9 does not do this).
>
> Computing the mapping parameters follows the logic of
> _dl_map_object_from_fd more closely now.
What's the performance of this on execve-heavy workloads, such as kernel
or glibc builds? Hopefully it's cheap because these mappings have not
been faulted in yet.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@gmail.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Use mmap to add PROT_BTI instead of mprotect [BZ #26831]
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:34:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9embufl.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5eaa74cb7538382b2fd2439755386ac68f7c8db.1604393169.git.szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> (Szabolcs Nagy's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:26:29 +0000")
* Szabolcs Nagy:
> Re-mmap executable segments if possible instead of using mprotect
> to add PROT_BTI. This allows using BTI protection with security
> policies that prevent mprotect with PROT_EXEC.
>
> If the fd of the ELF module is not available because it was kernel
> mapped then mprotect is used and failures are ignored. It is
> expected that linux kernel will add PROT_BTI when mapping a module
> (current linux as of version 5.9 does not do this).
>
> Computing the mapping parameters follows the logic of
> _dl_map_object_from_fd more closely now.
What's the performance of this on execve-heavy workloads, such as kernel
or glibc builds? Hopefully it's cheap because these mappings have not
been faulted in yet.
Thanks,
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 10:25 [PATCH 0/4] aarch64: avoid mprotect(PROT_BTI|PROT_EXEC) [BZ #26831] Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:25 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] elf: Pass the fd to note processing " Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:25 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] elf: Move note processing after l_phdr is updated " Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:26 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:38 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 10:38 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 12:36 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 12:36 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 15:04 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 15:04 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 15:27 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 15:27 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-03 10:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Use mmap to add PROT_BTI instead of mprotect " Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:26 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:34 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2020-11-03 10:34 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-03 10:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] aarch64: Remove the bti link_map field " Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 10:26 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-03 17:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] aarch64: avoid mprotect(PROT_BTI|PROT_EXEC) " Mark Brown
2020-11-03 17:34 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04 5:41 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04 5:41 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04 8:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-04 8:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-04 14:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 14:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 14:45 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04 14:45 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04 18:47 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04 18:53 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04 18:53 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-04 9:02 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 9:02 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 9:20 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-04 9:20 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-04 9:29 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04 9:29 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-04 9:55 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 9:55 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 14:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 14:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 15:19 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 15:19 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-04 16:08 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-04 16:08 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-04 15:20 ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-04 15:20 ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-04 18:59 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-04 18:59 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-11-05 11:31 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-05 11:31 ` Szabolcs Nagy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9embufl.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
--cc=s.mesoraca16@gmail.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=toiwoton@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.