All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dw_mmc: Handle unaligned data submission correctly
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:52:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vc8jml6r.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363085593-22214-3-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> (Markos Chandras's message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:53:13 +0000")

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Commit f9c2a0dc42a6938ff2a80e55ca2bbd1d5581c72e
> "mmc: dw_mmc: Fix PIO mode with support of highmem" introduced
> a regression since v3.2 making the mmc_test hang on test #13
> with a "Data starvation by host timeout" interrupt.
>
> This is because, sg_mapping_iter is used to iterate through the
> data which spans on multiple pages. The problem is detected on
> unaligned data submission where the code previously checked for
> !(sg_next(host->sg)) which is true because we only have a single
> scatter/gather list which then expands to multiple pages.
> Therefore, the driver incorrectly assumed that this was the last
> list item and submitted unaligned data to the mmc device. This
> overflowed the FIFO on the device before all the data were written
> to it. The code was fixed to only submit unaligned data when we are
> handling the last sg_miter item by checking whether we reached
> the desired data length or not.
>
> The patch was tested against mmc_test and all the tests passed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
> Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
> Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>

Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.10.

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
	"Jaehoon Chung" <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dw_mmc: Handle unaligned data submission correctly
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:52:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vc8jml6r.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363085593-22214-3-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> (Markos Chandras's message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:53:13 +0000")

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Commit f9c2a0dc42a6938ff2a80e55ca2bbd1d5581c72e
> "mmc: dw_mmc: Fix PIO mode with support of highmem" introduced
> a regression since v3.2 making the mmc_test hang on test #13
> with a "Data starvation by host timeout" interrupt.
>
> This is because, sg_mapping_iter is used to iterate through the
> data which spans on multiple pages. The problem is detected on
> unaligned data submission where the code previously checked for
> !(sg_next(host->sg)) which is true because we only have a single
> scatter/gather list which then expands to multiple pages.
> Therefore, the driver incorrectly assumed that this was the last
> list item and submitted unaligned data to the mmc device. This
> overflowed the FIFO on the device before all the data were written
> to it. The code was fixed to only submit unaligned data when we are
> handling the last sg_miter item by checking whether we reached
> the desired data length or not.
>
> The patch was tested against mmc_test and all the tests passed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
> Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
> Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>

Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.10.

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-22 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-12 10:53 [PATCH 1/3] dw_mmc: Don't loop when handling an interrupt Markos Chandras
2013-03-12 10:53 ` Markos Chandras
2013-03-12 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] dw_mmc: Avoid adding the number of transmitted bytes twice Markos Chandras
2013-03-12 10:53   ` Markos Chandras
2013-03-22 16:50   ` Chris Ball
2013-03-22 16:50     ` Chris Ball
2013-03-12 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] dw_mmc: Handle unaligned data submission correctly Markos Chandras
2013-03-12 10:53   ` Markos Chandras
2013-03-22 16:52   ` Chris Ball [this message]
2013-03-22 16:52     ` Chris Ball
2013-03-13  8:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] dw_mmc: Don't loop when handling an interrupt Jaehoon Chung
2013-03-13 14:22 ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-03-13 14:26   ` Markos Chandras
2013-03-13 14:26     ` Markos Chandras
2013-03-13 14:26   ` Chris Ball
2013-03-13 14:27     ` Markos Chandras
2013-03-13 14:27       ` Markos Chandras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vc8jml6r.fsf@octavius.laptop.org \
    --to=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
    --cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.