All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:28:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vcm9v4h1.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC83ZvJDfDBcRU1isYaxRe-fWN8F2+QW6W5EeWWuTRcFBGpYNg@mail.gmail.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:57:03 +0530")

"DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes:

[...]

>>> Oops... I am sorry.
>>> I was in the process of updating the branch with latest comments after
>>> base-lining on Grant's:
>>> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git
>>> Branch: gpio/next
>>> Because this has all the gpio changes including Benoit's latest gpio
>>> devicetree changes.
>>> Should I go ahead?
>> Anyways, for the time being I am updating on top of your changes as before.
>> You should be able to see the branch shortly.
> Please note that the branch has your following patch:
> gpio/omap: fix wakeups on level-triggered GPIOs

Please be sure to Cc the GPIO maintainer (added now.)

Grant can we consider your gpio/next a stable baseline for further
GPIO fixes?

If so, Tarun, please base your branch there.  Otherwise, continue to use
my for_3.4/gpio/runtime-pm-cleanup, but please test it by merging with
the gpio/next branch.

Thanks,

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:28:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vcm9v4h1.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC83ZvJDfDBcRU1isYaxRe-fWN8F2+QW6W5EeWWuTRcFBGpYNg@mail.gmail.com> (Tarun Kanti DebBarma's message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:57:03 +0530")

"DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" <tarun.kanti@ti.com> writes:

[...]

>>> Oops... I am sorry.
>>> I was in the process of updating the branch with latest comments after
>>> base-lining on Grant's:
>>> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git
>>> Branch: gpio/next
>>> Because this has all the gpio changes including Benoit's latest gpio
>>> devicetree changes.
>>> Should I go ahead?
>> Anyways, for the time being I am updating on top of your changes as before.
>> You should be able to see the branch shortly.
> Please note that the branch has your following patch:
> gpio/omap: fix wakeups on level-triggered GPIOs

Please be sure to Cc the GPIO maintainer (added now.)

Grant can we consider your gpio/next a stable baseline for further
GPIO fixes?

If so, Tarun, please base your branch there.  Otherwise, continue to use
my for_3.4/gpio/runtime-pm-cleanup, but please test it by merging with
the gpio/next branch.

Thanks,

Kevin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-12 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-07 11:15 [PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15 ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] gpio/omap: remove saved_fallingdetect, saved_risingdetect fields Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] gpio/omap: fix wakeup_en register update in _set_gpio_wakeup() Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:59   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 11:59     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup " Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] gpio/omap: get rid of retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-09  8:46   ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-09  8:46     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-12 18:53     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:53       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:52   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:52     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] gpio/omap: fix trigger type to unsigned Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] gpio/omap: fix _set_gpio_irqenable implementation Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] gpio/omap: remove redundant decoding of gpio offset Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 12:00   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 12:00     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] gpio/omap: remove suspend/resume callbacks Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:15   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 12:01   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 12:01     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] gpio/omap: fix missing dataout context save in _set_gpio_dataout_reg Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:16   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 12:03   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 12:03     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-08  3:34     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-08  3:34       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] gpio/omap: fix dataout register overwrite in _set_gpio_dataout_* Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:16   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 12:04   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 12:04     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-12 21:54   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 21:54     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-13  6:03     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-13  6:03       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-13  6:33       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-13  6:33         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-13  6:52         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-13  6:52           ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-13 16:27           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-13 16:27             ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14  1:53             ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-14  1:53               ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] gpio/omap: fix incorrect context restore logic in omap_gpio_runtime_resume Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:16   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 12:07   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 12:07     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-08  3:58     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-08  3:58       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-08  7:19       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-03-08  7:19         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-03-09  9:25         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-09  9:25           ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1 Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 11:16   ` Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-07 12:09   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-07 12:09     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-03-12 22:09   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 22:09     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-13  5:31     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-13  5:31       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-12 18:54 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 18:54   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 19:53   ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-12 19:53     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-12 20:08     ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-12 20:08       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-12 20:27       ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-12 20:27         ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-12 22:17         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 22:17           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-12 22:28         ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-03-12 22:28           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-13  3:57           ` Grant Likely
2012-03-13  3:57             ` Grant Likely
2012-03-13  4:35             ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-13  4:35               ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vcm9v4h1.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.