From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/31]: net: Implement simple sw TX hashing.
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:59:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vdz4sdqy.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080717.051635.124264554.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:16:35 -0700 (PDT)")
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> +static u16 simple_tx_hash(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + u32 *addr, *ports, hash, ihl;
> + u8 ip_proto;
> + int alen;
> +
> + switch (skb->protocol) {
> + case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP):
> + ip_proto = ip_hdr(skb)->protocol;
> + addr = &ip_hdr(skb)->saddr;
> + ihl = ip_hdr(skb)->ihl;
> + alen = 2;
> + break;
> + case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
> + ip_proto = ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr;
> + addr = &ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr.s6_addr32[0];
> + ihl = (40 >> 2);
> + alen = 8;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return 0;
Could you add a linuxmib counter for this default event? Just so that
people can diagnose this more easily.
> +
> + ports = (u32 *) (skb_network_header(skb) + (ihl * 4));
> +
> + hash = 0;
> + while (alen--)
> + hash ^= *addr++;
Are you sure the hash behaves the same between big endian and little
endian? Perhaps it would be safer to always convert endian even if
that complicates the code a bit.
> + hash ^= *ports;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + break;
And also a linuxmib counter here.
> + }
> +
> + return hash % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
I haven't rechecked it in detail, but I suspect some more
folding of higher bits would be better again for endian safety.
-Andi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>
To: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org,
johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/31]: net: Implement simple sw TX hashing.
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:59:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vdz4sdqy.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080717.051635.124264554.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:16:35 -0700 (PDT)")
David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> writes:
> +static u16 simple_tx_hash(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + u32 *addr, *ports, hash, ihl;
> + u8 ip_proto;
> + int alen;
> +
> + switch (skb->protocol) {
> + case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP):
> + ip_proto = ip_hdr(skb)->protocol;
> + addr = &ip_hdr(skb)->saddr;
> + ihl = ip_hdr(skb)->ihl;
> + alen = 2;
> + break;
> + case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
> + ip_proto = ipv6_hdr(skb)->nexthdr;
> + addr = &ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr.s6_addr32[0];
> + ihl = (40 >> 2);
> + alen = 8;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return 0;
Could you add a linuxmib counter for this default event? Just so that
people can diagnose this more easily.
> +
> + ports = (u32 *) (skb_network_header(skb) + (ihl * 4));
> +
> + hash = 0;
> + while (alen--)
> + hash ^= *addr++;
Are you sure the hash behaves the same between big endian and little
endian? Perhaps it would be safer to always convert endian even if
that complicates the code a bit.
> + hash ^= *ports;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + break;
And also a linuxmib counter here.
> + }
> +
> + return hash % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
I haven't rechecked it in detail, but I suspect some more
folding of higher bits would be better again for endian safety.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 12:16 [PATCH 11/31]: net: Implement simple sw TX hashing David Miller
2008-07-17 15:59 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-07-17 15:59 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-03 12:16 ` Brice Goglin
2008-08-03 12:35 ` Brice Goglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vdz4sdqy.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.