* [PATCH] HID: nvidia-shield: Select POWER_SUPPLY Kconfig option
@ 2023-09-17 15:18 Rahul Rameshbabu
2023-09-18 14:56 ` Jiri Kosina
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rahul Rameshbabu @ 2023-09-17 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Tissoires, Jiri Kosina; +Cc: linux-input, Rahul Rameshbabu
Battery information reported by the driver depends on the power supply
subsystem. Select the required subsystem when the HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD Kconfig
option is enabled.
Fixes: 3ab196f88237 ("HID: nvidia-shield: Add battery support for Thunderstrike")
Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/hid/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
index e11c1c803676..dc227f477601 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
@@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ config HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
tristate "NVIDIA SHIELD devices"
depends on USB_HID
depends on BT_HIDP
+ select POWER_SUPPLY
help
Support for NVIDIA SHIELD accessories.
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] HID: nvidia-shield: Select POWER_SUPPLY Kconfig option
2023-09-17 15:18 [PATCH] HID: nvidia-shield: Select POWER_SUPPLY Kconfig option Rahul Rameshbabu
@ 2023-09-18 14:56 ` Jiri Kosina
2023-09-18 16:18 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2023-09-18 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rahul Rameshbabu; +Cc: Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
> Battery information reported by the driver depends on the power supply
> subsystem. Select the required subsystem when the HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
> Kconfig option is enabled.
>
> Fixes: 3ab196f88237 ("HID: nvidia-shield: Add battery support for Thunderstrike")
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/hid/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> index e11c1c803676..dc227f477601 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ config HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
> tristate "NVIDIA SHIELD devices"
> depends on USB_HID
> depends on BT_HIDP
> + select POWER_SUPPLY
Is there a reason not to do it the standard way using 'depends on', and
not vice versa?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] HID: nvidia-shield: Select POWER_SUPPLY Kconfig option
2023-09-18 14:56 ` Jiri Kosina
@ 2023-09-18 16:18 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2023-10-04 18:49 ` Jiri Kosina
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rahul Rameshbabu @ 2023-09-18 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Kosina; +Cc: Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input
On Mon, 18 Sep, 2023 16:56:49 +0200 Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2023, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
>
>> Battery information reported by the driver depends on the power supply
>> subsystem. Select the required subsystem when the HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
>> Kconfig option is enabled.
>>
>> Fixes: 3ab196f88237 ("HID: nvidia-shield: Add battery support for Thunderstrike")
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hid/Kconfig | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> index e11c1c803676..dc227f477601 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ config HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
>> tristate "NVIDIA SHIELD devices"
>> depends on USB_HID
>> depends on BT_HIDP
>> + select POWER_SUPPLY
>
> Is there a reason not to do it the standard way using 'depends on', and
> not vice versa?
I originally used 'depends on' for POWER_SUPPLY. I took a look at
drivers/hid/Kconfig and saw that all modules that depended on
POWER_SUPPLY in the hid subsystem used 'select' instead. I figured I
should follow the trend.
--
Thanks,
Rahul Rameshbabu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] HID: nvidia-shield: Select POWER_SUPPLY Kconfig option
2023-09-18 16:18 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
@ 2023-10-04 18:49 ` Jiri Kosina
2023-10-05 23:54 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2023-10-04 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rahul Rameshbabu; +Cc: Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
> >> Battery information reported by the driver depends on the power supply
> >> subsystem. Select the required subsystem when the HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
> >> Kconfig option is enabled.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 3ab196f88237 ("HID: nvidia-shield: Add battery support for Thunderstrike")
> >> Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/hid/Kconfig | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> >> index e11c1c803676..dc227f477601 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> >> @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ config HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
> >> tristate "NVIDIA SHIELD devices"
> >> depends on USB_HID
> >> depends on BT_HIDP
> >> + select POWER_SUPPLY
> >
> > Is there a reason not to do it the standard way using 'depends on', and
> > not vice versa?
>
> I originally used 'depends on' for POWER_SUPPLY. I took a look at
> drivers/hid/Kconfig and saw that all modules that depended on
> POWER_SUPPLY in the hid subsystem used 'select' instead. I figured I
> should follow the trend.
You are right.
I still don't like the fact that we are forcefully selecting POWER_SUPPLY
like this, but that's a 6.7 material.
Appplied, thanks.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] HID: nvidia-shield: Select POWER_SUPPLY Kconfig option
2023-10-04 18:49 ` Jiri Kosina
@ 2023-10-05 23:54 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rahul Rameshbabu @ 2023-10-05 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Kosina; +Cc: Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input
On Wed, 04 Oct, 2023 20:49:07 +0200 Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
>
>> >> Battery information reported by the driver depends on the power supply
>> >> subsystem. Select the required subsystem when the HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
>> >> Kconfig option is enabled.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: 3ab196f88237 ("HID: nvidia-shield: Add battery support for Thunderstrike")
>> >> Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/hid/Kconfig | 1 +
>> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> >> index e11c1c803676..dc227f477601 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ config HID_NVIDIA_SHIELD
>> >> tristate "NVIDIA SHIELD devices"
>> >> depends on USB_HID
>> >> depends on BT_HIDP
>> >> + select POWER_SUPPLY
>> >
>> > Is there a reason not to do it the standard way using 'depends on', and
>> > not vice versa?
>>
>> I originally used 'depends on' for POWER_SUPPLY. I took a look at
>> drivers/hid/Kconfig and saw that all modules that depended on
>> POWER_SUPPLY in the hid subsystem used 'select' instead. I figured I
>> should follow the trend.
>
> You are right.
>
> I still don't like the fact that we are forcefully selecting POWER_SUPPLY
> like this, but that's a 6.7 material.
I agree. This bothered me as well, so I am glad you called it out. There
were some items I wanted to look at for 6.7. Do you want me to add this
to some other patches I am hoping to send out or did you want to take
care of this?
--
Thanks,
Rahul Rameshbabu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-05 23:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-17 15:18 [PATCH] HID: nvidia-shield: Select POWER_SUPPLY Kconfig option Rahul Rameshbabu
2023-09-18 14:56 ` Jiri Kosina
2023-09-18 16:18 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2023-10-04 18:49 ` Jiri Kosina
2023-10-05 23:54 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.