From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, zeffron@riotgames.com
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Should we remove xdp-newbies from kernel patch CC-list?
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 23:38:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wogsxl4g.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708.143147.1283579050790858840.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> From: Zvi Effron <zeffron@riotgames.com>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 12:28:52 -0500
>
>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:19 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Question to people subscribed to xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org mailing
>>> list. As you likely have noticed, patches and kbuild-bot is sending
>>> XDP related kernel stuff to this mailing list. This is caused by being
>>> listed in the kernel MAINTAINERS file[1].
>>>
>>
>> I cast my vote for both. Having the named newbies channel send many,
>> many messages with kernel patches is intimidating to new people (and
>> somewhat spammy) which makes it harder to convince my team to sign up
>> for the list. At the same time, I've appreciated being able to see
>> what's happening on patches as well as questions and discussions.
>>
>> Would it make sense/be possible to create a mailing list for the
>> maintainers file and discussions on patches that is separate from the
>> newbies channel? I have to say, the newbies channel is the only newbie
>> friendly kernel mailing list I've seen, and it's a big part of why I
>> pushed for my company to use XDP over DPDK.
>
> The bpf and netdev lists act as incubators for XDP discussion, so I don't
> know if it's worth making an xdp-devel or something like that.
I'd worry that it would fragment the discussion too much?
-Toke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-08 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-04 14:19 Should we remove xdp-newbies from kernel patch CC-list? Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-05 13:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-05 18:08 ` Arthur Gautier
2019-07-05 18:48 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-29 12:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-08 17:28 ` Zvi Effron
2019-07-08 21:31 ` David Miller
2019-07-08 21:38 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wogsxl4g.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zeffron@riotgames.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.