All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, airlied@linux.ieaniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
	julia.lawall@lip6.fr, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
	daniels@collabora.com, derekf@osg.samsung.com,
	varadgautam@gmail.com
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 17:57:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpncot4u.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462217122-13071-2-git-send-email-robert.foss@collabora.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3762 bytes --]

robert.foss@collabora.com writes:

> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
>
> As per the docs, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY "if an asycnhronous
> update is requested and there is an earlier update pending".

Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:

	 *  - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is
	 *    an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue
	 *    of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that.
	 *    Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a
	 *    synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the
	 *    commit in that case.

> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c
> index 355ee4b..43193a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c
> @@ -802,3 +802,9 @@ struct platform_driver vc4_crtc_driver = {
>  		.of_match_table = vc4_crtc_dt_match,
>  	},
>  };
> +
> +bool vc4_crtc_has_pending_event(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> +	assert_spin_locked(&crtc->dev->event_lock);
> +	return to_vc4_crtc(crtc)->event;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> index fa2ad15..54c1fb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ extern struct platform_driver vc4_crtc_driver;
>  int vc4_enable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int crtc_id);
>  void vc4_disable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int crtc_id);
>  int vc4_crtc_debugfs_regs(struct seq_file *m, void *arg);
> +bool vc4_crtc_has_pending_event(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
>  
>  /* vc4_debugfs.c */
>  int vc4_debugfs_init(struct drm_minor *minor);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
> index 4718ae5..dc157a1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
> @@ -107,10 +107,26 @@ static int vc4_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
>  			     bool async)
>  {
>  	struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(dev);
> -	int ret;
> -	int i;
>  	uint64_t wait_seqno = 0;
>  	struct vc4_commit *c;
> +	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	if (async) {
> +		for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> +
> +			spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> +
> +			if (crtc->state->event || 
> +				vc4_crtc_has_pending_event(crtc)) {
> +				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> +				return -EBUSY;
> +			}
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> +		}
> +	}

By my reading, the point of returning -EBUSY here is just to avoid
blocking when the compositor asked for nonblocking.  You're checking
that each CRTC involved in the commit doesn't have a queued pageflip
event, except that then we immediately proceed to:

	/* Make sure that any outstanding modesets have finished. */
	ret = down_interruptible(&vc4->async_modeset);
	if (ret) {
		kfree(c);
		return ret;
	}

so this per-CRTC check doesn't prevent blocking if the set of CRTCs for
this commit was disjoint from the last one, right?  To implement the
minimal behavior, I think we'd want to just down_trylock instead in the
async case, I think.  And to implement the disjoint CRTC thing you were
trying for, I think we'd need to track a mask kind of like msm's
pending_crtcs.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: robert.foss@collabora.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
	airlied@linux.ie, aniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, julia.lawall@lip6.fr,
	alexander.deucher@amd.com, daniels@collabora.com,
	derekf@osg.samsung.com, varadgautam@gmail.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 17:57:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpncot4u.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462217122-13071-2-git-send-email-robert.foss@collabora.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3762 bytes --]

robert.foss@collabora.com writes:

> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
>
> As per the docs, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY "if an asycnhronous
> update is requested and there is an earlier update pending".

Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:

	 *  - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is
	 *    an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue
	 *    of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that.
	 *    Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a
	 *    synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the
	 *    commit in that case.

> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c
> index 355ee4b..43193a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c
> @@ -802,3 +802,9 @@ struct platform_driver vc4_crtc_driver = {
>  		.of_match_table = vc4_crtc_dt_match,
>  	},
>  };
> +
> +bool vc4_crtc_has_pending_event(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> +	assert_spin_locked(&crtc->dev->event_lock);
> +	return to_vc4_crtc(crtc)->event;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> index fa2ad15..54c1fb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ extern struct platform_driver vc4_crtc_driver;
>  int vc4_enable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int crtc_id);
>  void vc4_disable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int crtc_id);
>  int vc4_crtc_debugfs_regs(struct seq_file *m, void *arg);
> +bool vc4_crtc_has_pending_event(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
>  
>  /* vc4_debugfs.c */
>  int vc4_debugfs_init(struct drm_minor *minor);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
> index 4718ae5..dc157a1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c
> @@ -107,10 +107,26 @@ static int vc4_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
>  			     bool async)
>  {
>  	struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(dev);
> -	int ret;
> -	int i;
>  	uint64_t wait_seqno = 0;
>  	struct vc4_commit *c;
> +	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	if (async) {
> +		for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> +
> +			spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> +
> +			if (crtc->state->event || 
> +				vc4_crtc_has_pending_event(crtc)) {
> +				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> +				return -EBUSY;
> +			}
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> +		}
> +	}

By my reading, the point of returning -EBUSY here is just to avoid
blocking when the compositor asked for nonblocking.  You're checking
that each CRTC involved in the commit doesn't have a queued pageflip
event, except that then we immediately proceed to:

	/* Make sure that any outstanding modesets have finished. */
	ret = down_interruptible(&vc4->async_modeset);
	if (ret) {
		kfree(c);
		return ret;
	}

so this per-CRTC check doesn't prevent blocking if the set of CRTCs for
this commit was disjoint from the last one, right?  To implement the
minimal behavior, I think we'd want to just down_trylock instead in the
async case, I think.  And to implement the disjoint CRTC thing you were
trying for, I think we'd need to track a mask kind of like msm's
pending_crtcs.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-03  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-02 19:25 [PATCH] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event robert.foss
2016-05-02 19:25 ` robert.foss
2016-05-02 19:25 ` robert.foss
2016-05-02 19:25   ` robert.foss
2016-05-03  0:57   ` Eric Anholt [this message]
2016-05-03  0:57     ` Eric Anholt
2016-05-03 14:20     ` Robert Foss
2016-05-03 14:20       ` Robert Foss
2016-05-03 17:11       ` Eric Anholt
2016-05-03 17:11         ` Eric Anholt
2016-05-03  7:11   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-03  7:11     ` Maarten Lankhorst
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-26 17:47 robert.foss
2016-04-26 17:43 robert.foss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wpncot4u.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net \
    --to=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ieaniel.vetter \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.foss@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.