All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:46:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqtuegs9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16100EF6-6C55-47ED-9BBB-2C3CAC8FA37A@sde.cz>

Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz> writes:
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:14:49AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz> writes:
>>> 
>>>> When virtio-blk device is resized from host (using block_resize from QEMU) emit
>>>> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to notify guest about such change. This allows user to have
>>>> custom udev rules which would take whatever action if such event occurs. As a
>>>> proof of concept I've created simple udev rule that automatically resize
>>>> filesystem on virtio-blk device.
>>>> 
>>>> ACTION="change", KERNEL="vd*", \
>>>>        ENV{RESIZE}="1", \
>>>>        ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}="ext[3-4]", \
>>>>        RUN+="/sbin/resize2fs /dev/%k"
>>>> ACTION="change", KERNEL="vd*", \
>>>>        ENV{RESIZE}="1", \
>>>>        ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}="LVM2_member", \
>>>>        RUN+="/sbin/pvresize /dev/%k"
>>> 
>>> This looks fine to me, but I like to check with Greg before adding udev
>>> callouts.... Greg?
>> 
>> Hm, I thought we were frowning apon running binaries from udev rules
>> these days, especially ones that might have big consequences (like
>> resizing a disk image) like this.
>> 
>> Kay, am I right?
>> 
>> We already emit KOBJECT_CHANGE events when block devices change, from
>> within the block core code.  Why is the patch below needed instead of
>> using these events that are already generated?  How are virtio block
>> devices special?
>> 
>>> BTW, if this is good, it's good for stable IMHO.
>> 
>> What bug does it fix?
>> 
>
> It is not really a bug but it definitely is useful enhancement to have in stable too. I
> can imagine lots of people can benefit from this.

But that applies to almost any enhancement :)

It will go in *next* merge window, not this one.

Thanks,
Rusty.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:04:14 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqtuegs9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16100EF6-6C55-47ED-9BBB-2C3CAC8FA37A@sde.cz>

Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz> writes:
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:14:49AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz> writes:
>>> 
>>>> When virtio-blk device is resized from host (using block_resize from QEMU) emit
>>>> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to notify guest about such change. This allows user to have
>>>> custom udev rules which would take whatever action if such event occurs. As a
>>>> proof of concept I've created simple udev rule that automatically resize
>>>> filesystem on virtio-blk device.
>>>> 
>>>> ACTION=="change", KERNEL=="vd*", \
>>>>        ENV{RESIZE}=="1", \
>>>>        ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="ext[3-4]", \
>>>>        RUN+="/sbin/resize2fs /dev/%k"
>>>> ACTION=="change", KERNEL=="vd*", \
>>>>        ENV{RESIZE}=="1", \
>>>>        ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="LVM2_member", \
>>>>        RUN+="/sbin/pvresize /dev/%k"
>>> 
>>> This looks fine to me, but I like to check with Greg before adding udev
>>> callouts.... Greg?
>> 
>> Hm, I thought we were frowning apon running binaries from udev rules
>> these days, especially ones that might have big consequences (like
>> resizing a disk image) like this.
>> 
>> Kay, am I right?
>> 
>> We already emit KOBJECT_CHANGE events when block devices change, from
>> within the block core code.  Why is the patch below needed instead of
>> using these events that are already generated?  How are virtio block
>> devices special?
>> 
>>> BTW, if this is good, it's good for stable IMHO.
>> 
>> What bug does it fix?
>> 
>
> It is not really a bug but it definitely is useful enhancement to have in stable too. I
> can imagine lots of people can benefit from this.

But that applies to almost any enhancement :)

It will go in *next* merge window, not this one.

Thanks,
Rusty.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:04:14 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqtuegs9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16100EF6-6C55-47ED-9BBB-2C3CAC8FA37A@sde.cz>

Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz> writes:
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:14:49AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@sde.cz> writes:
>>> 
>>>> When virtio-blk device is resized from host (using block_resize from QEMU) emit
>>>> KOBJ_CHANGE uevent to notify guest about such change. This allows user to have
>>>> custom udev rules which would take whatever action if such event occurs. As a
>>>> proof of concept I've created simple udev rule that automatically resize
>>>> filesystem on virtio-blk device.
>>>> 
>>>> ACTION=="change", KERNEL=="vd*", \
>>>>        ENV{RESIZE}=="1", \
>>>>        ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="ext[3-4]", \
>>>>        RUN+="/sbin/resize2fs /dev/%k"
>>>> ACTION=="change", KERNEL=="vd*", \
>>>>        ENV{RESIZE}=="1", \
>>>>        ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="LVM2_member", \
>>>>        RUN+="/sbin/pvresize /dev/%k"
>>> 
>>> This looks fine to me, but I like to check with Greg before adding udev
>>> callouts.... Greg?
>> 
>> Hm, I thought we were frowning apon running binaries from udev rules
>> these days, especially ones that might have big consequences (like
>> resizing a disk image) like this.
>> 
>> Kay, am I right?
>> 
>> We already emit KOBJECT_CHANGE events when block devices change, from
>> within the block core code.  Why is the patch below needed instead of
>> using these events that are already generated?  How are virtio block
>> devices special?
>> 
>>> BTW, if this is good, it's good for stable IMHO.
>> 
>> What bug does it fix?
>> 
>
> It is not really a bug but it definitely is useful enhancement to have in stable too. I
> can imagine lots of people can benefit from this.

But that applies to almost any enhancement :)

It will go in *next* merge window, not this one.

Thanks,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-27  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-21 19:02 [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized Milos Vyletel
2013-02-21 23:44 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-21 23:44   ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-25 22:12   ` Greg KH
2013-02-25 22:12     ` Greg KH
2013-02-25 22:12     ` Greg KH
2013-02-25 22:39     ` Kay Sievers
2013-02-25 22:39       ` Kay Sievers
2013-02-25 22:43       ` Greg KH
2013-02-25 22:43         ` Greg KH
2013-02-25 23:04         ` Kay Sievers
2013-02-25 23:04           ` Kay Sievers
2013-02-25 23:04         ` Kay Sievers
2013-02-25 22:43       ` Greg KH
2013-02-25 23:38       ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-25 23:38         ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-25 23:38         ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-25 22:39     ` Kay Sievers
2013-02-25 23:41     ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-25 23:41       ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-25 23:41       ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-27  0:34       ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2013-02-27  0:46         ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-27  0:34         ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-27 13:09         ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-27 13:09         ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-27 13:09           ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-25  7:43 ` Asias He
2013-02-25  7:43   ` Asias He
2013-02-25 14:54   ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-25 14:54     ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-26  3:09     ` Asias He
2013-02-26  3:09       ` Asias He
2013-02-26 13:05       ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-26 13:05         ` Milos Vyletel
2013-02-27  0:37 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-27  0:37   ` Rusty Russell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-02-21 19:02 Milos Vyletel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wqtuegs9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milos.vyletel@sde.cz \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.