From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
tony@atomide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 00/23]I2C big cleanup
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:08:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqzysuu3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pq5quaqr.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:39:24 -0700")
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> writes:
> Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:27:54PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> This is the cleanup only series.
>>>
>>> Tested on omap4sdp and 3430sdp.
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 55d512e245bc7699a8800e23df1a24195dd08217:
>>>
>>> Linux 3.6-rc5 (2012-09-08 16:43:45 -0700)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>> git://gitorious.org/linus-tree/linus-tree.git for_3.7/i2c/big_cleanups
>>
>> Pushed to -next. Thanks to all involved!
>
> Sorry to be late to the party (again), but still catching up after some
> time off.
>
> Unfortunately, this series causes PM regressions on several OMAP
> platforms. I hope we can hold off on this until those issues are
> addressed.
I tracked the regression down to [PATCHv8 21/22] (see reply there.)
Since this series is already merged, I suggest that the problem patch be
reverted, at least for v3.7 and until the problem is better understood
and tested.
With that patch reverted, all my PM tests are passing. Feel free to
add:
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv8 00/23]I2C big cleanup
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:08:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqzysuu3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pq5quaqr.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:39:24 -0700")
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> writes:
> Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:27:54PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> This is the cleanup only series.
>>>
>>> Tested on omap4sdp and 3430sdp.
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 55d512e245bc7699a8800e23df1a24195dd08217:
>>>
>>> Linux 3.6-rc5 (2012-09-08 16:43:45 -0700)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>> git://gitorious.org/linus-tree/linus-tree.git for_3.7/i2c/big_cleanups
>>
>> Pushed to -next. Thanks to all involved!
>
> Sorry to be late to the party (again), but still catching up after some
> time off.
>
> Unfortunately, this series causes PM regressions on several OMAP
> platforms. I hope we can hold off on this until those issues are
> addressed.
I tracked the regression down to [PATCHv8 21/22] (see reply there.)
Since this series is already merged, I suggest that the problem patch be
reverted, at least for v3.7 and until the problem is better understood
and tested.
With that patch reverted, all my PM tests are passing. Feel free to
add:
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-12 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 10:57 [PATCHv8 00/23]I2C big cleanup Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` [PATCHv8 01/22] i2c: omap: switch to devm_* API Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` [PATCHv8 04/22] i2c: omap: add blank lines Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` [PATCHv8 05/22] i2c: omap: simplify omap_i2c_ack_stat() Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 08/22] i2c: omap: re-factor receive/transmit data loop Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 12/22] i2c: omap: bus: add a receiver flag Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 13/22] i2c: omap: simplify errata check Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 14/22] i2c: omap: always return IRQ_HANDLED Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 20/22] i2c: omap: remove unnecessary pm_runtime_suspended check Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1347447496-16793-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12 10:57 ` [PATCHv8 02/22] i2c: omap: simplify num_bytes handling Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` [PATCHv8 03/22] i2c: omap: decrease indentation level on data handling Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:57 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 06/22] i2c: omap: split out [XR]DR and [XR]RDY Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 07/22] i2c: omap: improve i462 errata handling Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 09/22] i2c: omap: switch over to do {} while loop Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 10/22] i2c: omap: ack IRQ in parts Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 11/22] i2c: omap: switch to platform_get_irq() Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 15/22] i2c: omap: simplify IRQ exit path Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 16/22] i2c: omap: resize fifos before each message Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 17/22] i2c: omap: get rid of the "complete" label Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 18/22] i2c: omap: remove redundant status read Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 19/22] i2c: omap: switch to threaded IRQ support Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 21/22] i2c: omap: switch over to autosuspend API Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1347447496-16793-22-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12 23:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-12 23:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-12 13:16 ` [PATCHv8 00/23]I2C big cleanup Wolfram Sang
2012-09-12 13:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-12 13:25 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-09-12 13:25 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <20120912131615.GB16547-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12 22:39 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-12 22:39 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-12 23:08 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-09-12 23:08 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87wqzysuu3.fsf-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 8:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-13 8:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-09-13 18:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-13 18:04 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87sjaldcjp.fsf-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 18:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-09-13 18:37 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20120913183705.GA17430-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 21:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-13 21:28 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87txv1bokd.fsf-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14 10:40 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-09-14 10:40 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-09-12 22:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-12 22:27 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <874nn2vpv9.fsf-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 5:33 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-09-13 5:33 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-09-13 14:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-13 14:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-13 6:04 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-09-13 6:04 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <50517780.2080002-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 6:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-09-13 6:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-09-13 6:55 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-09-13 6:55 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-09-12 10:58 ` [PATCHv8 22/22] i2c: omap: sanitize exit path Shubhrajyoti D
2012-09-12 10:58 ` Shubhrajyoti D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wqzysuu3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.