All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>
Cc: Xen devel list <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:00:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wt3kz8fg.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AF7CDD.6090709@suse.de> (Gerd Hoffmann's message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:57:49 +0100")

Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de> writes:

>   Hi,
>
> There is a problem with the virtual framebuffer: The page directory in
> the shared page (xenfb_page->pd[]) is unsigned long and thus has
> different sizes on 32bit and 64bit.  The alignment is different too. And
> on top of that the frontend driver doesn't clear the shared page, which
> makes it difficult to autodetect the bitsize.  I've tried nevertheless,
> patch (untested!) attached for comments.  In the long run this code is
> supposed to be replaced by grant tables anyway, so it is probably okay
> to live with the hack for the time being.  We could of course also fix
> the struct if we can afford breaking the interface.  As it is quite new
> and probably (hmm, does fc6 ship it?) not widely used yet that might be
> an option.

Breaking the API now is right out of the question, I fear :)

You can evolve the API.  Let the frontend put something in xenstore[*]
that lets the backend detect which page layout to use.  Make sure the
backend can deal with old and new frontend.  I doubt it's worthwhile
here.

Excuse my ignorance, but why do you have to guess the guest's size?
Doesn't dom0 know?


[*] I suggested to put version ID right into the page, but that was
shot down in favor of xenstore.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-01-18 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-18 13:57 32-on-64: pvfb issue Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-18 14:07 ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-18 15:00 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2007-01-18 15:35   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-18 15:53     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2007-01-18 16:34       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-18 16:55         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-18 17:05         ` Daniel P. Berrange
2007-01-18 18:31     ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19  9:46       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19  9:54       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 10:31         ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-19 10:46           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 11:53             ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-19 11:10         ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 11:43           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 12:01             ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 12:59               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 13:45                 ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 15:08                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 15:22                     ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 15:31                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 16:05                         ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-20  0:09                           ` [Patch] [VTPM_TOOLS] Add HVM support to vtpm_manager Scarlata, Vincent R
2007-01-22  7:50                           ` 32-on-64: pvfb issue Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-22 14:01                             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-22 14:48                               ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-23 12:53                                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-23 15:07                                   ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-23 15:56                                     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-24 11:23                                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-24 12:02                                     ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-24 12:24                                     ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-24 12:38                                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-24 14:24                                         ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-24 15:25                                           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-25 13:16                                   ` 32-on-64 broken in unstable Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-25 13:25                                     ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-25 13:34                                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-22 15:22                               ` 32-on-64: pvfb issue Markus Armbruster
2007-01-22 15:33                                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-22 15:40                                   ` Keir Fraser
2007-01-19 16:06                         ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-22  7:56                           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-01-19 10:43       ` Ian Campbell
2007-01-19 12:03         ` Markus Armbruster
2007-01-22 18:32       ` Does vt-x itself have perf. impact on Hypervisor w/o considering HVM? Liang Yang
2007-01-23 10:05         ` [Xen-users] " Petersson, Mats
2007-01-23 16:15           ` Liang Yang
2007-01-23 16:33             ` Petersson, Mats

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wt3kz8fg.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@suse.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.