* Re: [Xen-changelog] Add a /proc interface for setting rx-buffer allocation policy in
[not found] <E1DSvAn-00020G-Ow@moria.surriel.com>
@ 2005-05-03 11:31 ` Gerd Knorr
2005-05-03 12:21 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Knorr @ 2005-05-03 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xen Development List
BitKeeper Bot <riel@surriel.com> writes:
> ChangeSet 1.1159.256.110, 2005/05/03 11:54:00+01:00, kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>
> Add a /proc interface for setting rx-buffer allocation policy in
> the netfront driver.
> e.g., 'echo 256 >/proc/xen/net/eth0/rxbuf_min' will avoid unnecessary
> packet drops by always allocating the maximum possible number of
> buffers at all times, at the expense of extra memory usage when the
> interface is idle.
Be prepared to be flamed for that on lkml, using /proc for stuff like
that (i.e. driver specifix settings) is depricated these days. It
should go to sysfs instead.
I can come up with a patch for that, might take some days though as
I'm busy with some non-xen stuff at the moment.
cheers,
Gerd
btw: can whoever runs the changelog list (rik?) please add the
repository (2.0, unstable, ...) to to subject line please? And while
you are at it: -p1 for the diffstat would be cool as well, especially
for one-file commits, there are -- for example -- plenty of page.h
files in the tree. Thanks.
--
#define printk(args...) fprintf(stderr, ## args)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [Xen-changelog] Add a /proc interface for setting rx-buffer allocation policy in
2005-05-03 11:31 ` [Xen-changelog] Add a /proc interface for setting rx-buffer allocation policy in Gerd Knorr
@ 2005-05-03 12:21 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2005-05-03 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerd Knorr; +Cc: Xen Development List
On 3 May 2005, at 12:31, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> Be prepared to be flamed for that on lkml, using /proc for stuff like
> that (i.e. driver specifix settings) is depricated these days. It
> should go to sysfs instead.
>
> I can come up with a patch for that, might take some days though as
> I'm busy with some non-xen stuff at the moment.
This should happen when xenbus is implemented -- it can create a
virtual bus in sysfs and then virtual device info and parameters can
hang off of that. I think someone from Redhat (possibly Jeremy Katz)
was going to look into implementing xenbus.
For the time being I don't see any reason for them not to hang out in
/proc. We probably want xenbus before going into mainline anyway.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-03 12:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E1DSvAn-00020G-Ow@moria.surriel.com>
2005-05-03 11:31 ` [Xen-changelog] Add a /proc interface for setting rx-buffer allocation policy in Gerd Knorr
2005-05-03 12:21 ` Keir Fraser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.