Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_user_data in sunxi_nfc_caps

From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	"Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
	"Wentao Liang" <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>,
	"Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_user_data in sunxi_nfc_caps
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 10:54:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0p3tiz9.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020101311.256819-5-richard.genoud@bootlin.com> (Richard Genoud's message of "Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:13:00 +0200")

Hi Richard,

On 20/10/2025 at 12:13:00 +02, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com> wrote:

> The H6/H616 USER_DATA register is not at the same offset as the
> A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> index 0285e4d0ca7f..8f5d8df19e33 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,8 @@
>  #define NFC_REG_DEBUG		0x003C
>  #define NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT	0x0040
>  #define NFC_REG_ECC_ERR_CNT(nfc, x)	((nfc->caps->reg_ecc_err_cnt + (x)) & ~0x3)
> -#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA(x)	(0x0050 + ((x) * 4))
> +#define NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA	0x0050
> +#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA(nfc, x)	(nfc->caps->reg_user_data + ((x) * 4))
>  #define NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA	0x00A0
>  #define NFC_REG_PAT_ID		0x00A4
>  #define NFC_REG_MDMA_ADDR	0x00C0
> @@ -214,6 +215,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
>   *			through MBUS on A23/A33 needs extra configuration.
>   * @reg_io_data:	I/O data register
>   * @reg_ecc_err_cnt:	ECC error counter register
> + * @reg_user_data:	User data register
>   * @dma_maxburst:	DMA maxburst
>   * @ecc_strengths:	Available ECC strengths array
>   * @nstrengths:		Size of @ecc_strengths
> @@ -222,6 +224,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
>  	bool has_mdma;
>  	unsigned int reg_io_data;
>  	unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
> +	unsigned int reg_user_data;
>  	unsigned int dma_maxburst;
>  	const u8 *ecc_strengths;
>  	unsigned int nstrengths;
> @@ -723,8 +726,8 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_get_prot_oob_bytes(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob,
>  {
>  	struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
>  
> -	sunxi_nfc_user_data_to_buf(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA(step)),
> -				   oob);
> +	sunxi_nfc_user_data_to_buf(readl(nfc->regs +
> +					 NFC_REG_USER_DATA(nfc, step)),
> oob);

Minor nit, column limit is 100 now, so typically for this kind of
situation everything would fit on a single line.

Don't respin just for that if there is nothing else later, but if a v4
is needed you can change it.

Looks neat otherwise so far.

Thanks,
Miquèl