From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Lucas Zampieri <lzampier@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Vivian Wang <dramforever@live.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Zhang Xincheng <zhangxincheng@ultrarisc.com>,
Lucas Zampieri <lzampier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] irqchip/plic: add support for UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 20:40:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0pc100g.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015143108.441291-4-lzampier@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 15 2025 at 15:31, Lucas Zampieri wrote:
> +static bool cp100_isolate_pending_irq(int nr_irq_groups, u32 ie[],
> + void __iomem *pending,
> + void __iomem *enable)
> +{
> + u32 pending_irqs = 0;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + /* Look for first pending interrupt */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++) {
> + pending_irqs = ie[i] & readl_relaxed(pending + i * sizeof(u32));
> + if (pending_irqs)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!pending_irqs)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Disable all interrupts but the first pending one */
> + for (j = 0; j < nr_irq_groups; j++) {
> + u32 new_mask = 0;
> +
> + if (j == i)
> + /* Extract mask with lowest set bit */
> + new_mask = (pending_irqs & -pending_irqs);
Please add brackets around the conditional as it's not a true single
line.
> +static irq_hw_number_t cp100_get_hwirq(struct plic_handler *handler,
> + void __iomem *claim)
> +{
> + void __iomem *enable = handler->enable_base;
> + void __iomem *pending = handler->priv->regs + PENDING_BASE;
> + int nr_irqs = handler->priv->nr_irqs;
> + int nr_irq_groups = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_irqs, 32);
> + int i;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = 0;
Please use reverse fir tree ordering:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#variable-declarations
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&handler->enable_lock);
Please use
guard(raw_spinlock)(&handler->....);
which gets rid of the goto and you can just return instead.
> + /* Save current interrupt enable state */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++)
> + handler->enable_save[i] = readl_relaxed(enable + i * sizeof(u32));
> +
> + if (!cp100_isolate_pending_irq(nr_irq_groups, handler->enable_save, pending, enable))
> + goto out;
> +
> + hwirq = readl(claim);
> +
> + /* Restore previous state */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++)
> + writel_relaxed(handler->enable_save[i], enable + i * sizeof(u32));
> +out:
> + raw_spin_unlock(&handler->enable_lock);
> + return hwirq;
> +}
> +
> +static void plic_handle_irq_cp100(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + void __iomem *claim = handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!handler->present);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + while ((hwirq = cp100_get_hwirq(handler, claim))) {
> + int err = generic_handle_domain_irq(handler->priv->irqdomain,
> + hwirq);
Let it stick out, you have 100 characters
> + if (unlikely(err)) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("%pfwP: can't find mapping for hwirq %lu\n",
> + handler->priv->fwnode, hwirq);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> static void plic_set_threshold(struct plic_handler *handler, u32 threshold)
> {
> /* priority must be > threshold to trigger an interrupt */
> @@ -430,6 +516,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id plic_match[] = {
> .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT) },
> { .compatible = "thead,c900-plic",
> .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT) },
> + { .compatible = "ultrarisc,cp100-plic",
> + .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_CP100_CLAIM_REGISTER_ERRATUM) },
> {}
> };
>
> @@ -664,12 +752,16 @@ static int plic_probe(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> }
>
> if (global_setup) {
> + void (*handler_fn)(struct irq_desc *) = plic_handle_irq;
Lacks a newline between variable declaration and code.
> + if (test_bit(PLIC_QUIRK_CP100_CLAIM_REGISTER_ERRATUM, &handler->priv->plic_quirks))
> + handler_fn = plic_handle_irq_cp100;
> +
> /* Find parent domain and register chained handler */
> domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(riscv_get_intc_hwnode(), DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
> if (domain)
> plic_parent_irq = irq_create_mapping(domain, RV_IRQ_EXT);
> if (plic_parent_irq)
> - irq_set_chained_handler(plic_parent_irq, plic_handle_irq);
> + irq_set_chained_handler(plic_parent_irq, handler_fn);
>
> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_IRQ_SIFIVE_PLIC_STARTING,
> "irqchip/sifive/plic:starting",
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Lucas Zampieri <lzampier@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Vivian Wang <dramforever@live.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Zhang Xincheng <zhangxincheng@ultrarisc.com>,
Lucas Zampieri <lzampier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] irqchip/plic: add support for UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 20:40:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0pc100g.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015143108.441291-4-lzampier@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 15 2025 at 15:31, Lucas Zampieri wrote:
> +static bool cp100_isolate_pending_irq(int nr_irq_groups, u32 ie[],
> + void __iomem *pending,
> + void __iomem *enable)
> +{
> + u32 pending_irqs = 0;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + /* Look for first pending interrupt */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++) {
> + pending_irqs = ie[i] & readl_relaxed(pending + i * sizeof(u32));
> + if (pending_irqs)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!pending_irqs)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Disable all interrupts but the first pending one */
> + for (j = 0; j < nr_irq_groups; j++) {
> + u32 new_mask = 0;
> +
> + if (j == i)
> + /* Extract mask with lowest set bit */
> + new_mask = (pending_irqs & -pending_irqs);
Please add brackets around the conditional as it's not a true single
line.
> +static irq_hw_number_t cp100_get_hwirq(struct plic_handler *handler,
> + void __iomem *claim)
> +{
> + void __iomem *enable = handler->enable_base;
> + void __iomem *pending = handler->priv->regs + PENDING_BASE;
> + int nr_irqs = handler->priv->nr_irqs;
> + int nr_irq_groups = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_irqs, 32);
> + int i;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = 0;
Please use reverse fir tree ordering:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#variable-declarations
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&handler->enable_lock);
Please use
guard(raw_spinlock)(&handler->....);
which gets rid of the goto and you can just return instead.
> + /* Save current interrupt enable state */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++)
> + handler->enable_save[i] = readl_relaxed(enable + i * sizeof(u32));
> +
> + if (!cp100_isolate_pending_irq(nr_irq_groups, handler->enable_save, pending, enable))
> + goto out;
> +
> + hwirq = readl(claim);
> +
> + /* Restore previous state */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++)
> + writel_relaxed(handler->enable_save[i], enable + i * sizeof(u32));
> +out:
> + raw_spin_unlock(&handler->enable_lock);
> + return hwirq;
> +}
> +
> +static void plic_handle_irq_cp100(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + void __iomem *claim = handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!handler->present);
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> + while ((hwirq = cp100_get_hwirq(handler, claim))) {
> + int err = generic_handle_domain_irq(handler->priv->irqdomain,
> + hwirq);
Let it stick out, you have 100 characters
> + if (unlikely(err)) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("%pfwP: can't find mapping for hwirq %lu\n",
> + handler->priv->fwnode, hwirq);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> static void plic_set_threshold(struct plic_handler *handler, u32 threshold)
> {
> /* priority must be > threshold to trigger an interrupt */
> @@ -430,6 +516,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id plic_match[] = {
> .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT) },
> { .compatible = "thead,c900-plic",
> .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT) },
> + { .compatible = "ultrarisc,cp100-plic",
> + .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_CP100_CLAIM_REGISTER_ERRATUM) },
> {}
> };
>
> @@ -664,12 +752,16 @@ static int plic_probe(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> }
>
> if (global_setup) {
> + void (*handler_fn)(struct irq_desc *) = plic_handle_irq;
Lacks a newline between variable declaration and code.
> + if (test_bit(PLIC_QUIRK_CP100_CLAIM_REGISTER_ERRATUM, &handler->priv->plic_quirks))
> + handler_fn = plic_handle_irq_cp100;
> +
> /* Find parent domain and register chained handler */
> domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(riscv_get_intc_hwnode(), DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
> if (domain)
> plic_parent_irq = irq_create_mapping(domain, RV_IRQ_EXT);
> if (plic_parent_irq)
> - irq_set_chained_handler(plic_parent_irq, plic_handle_irq);
> + irq_set_chained_handler(plic_parent_irq, handler_fn);
>
> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_IRQ_SIFIVE_PLIC_STARTING,
> "irqchip/sifive/plic:starting",
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 14:31 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC support Lucas Zampieri
2025-10-15 14:31 ` Lucas Zampieri
2025-10-15 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add UltraRISC Lucas Zampieri
2025-10-15 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC Lucas Zampieri
2025-10-15 14:31 ` Lucas Zampieri
2025-10-15 14:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] irqchip/plic: add support for " Lucas Zampieri
2025-10-15 14:31 ` Lucas Zampieri
2025-10-15 18:40 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-10-15 18:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0pc100g.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=cmirabil@redhat.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dramforever@live.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lzampier@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=zhangxincheng@ultrarisc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.