* [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
@ 2020-08-14 14:48 ` Tang Bin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tang Bin @ 2020-08-14 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvalo, davem
Cc: Tang Bin, netdev, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, ath10k,
Zhang Shengju
In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
@@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
- return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
+ return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
}
ar_ahb->ref_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_ref");
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get ref clk: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk));
- return ar_ahb->ref_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk) : -ENODEV;
+ return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk);
}
ar_ahb->rtc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_rtc");
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get rtc clk: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk));
- return ar_ahb->rtc_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk) : -ENODEV;
+ return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk);
}
return 0;
--
2.20.1.windows.1
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
@ 2020-08-14 14:48 ` Tang Bin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tang Bin @ 2020-08-14 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvalo, davem
Cc: ath10k, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel, Tang Bin,
Zhang Shengju
In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
@@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
- return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
+ return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
}
ar_ahb->ref_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_ref");
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get ref clk: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk));
- return ar_ahb->ref_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk) : -ENODEV;
+ return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk);
}
ar_ahb->rtc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_rtc");
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
+ if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get rtc clk: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk));
- return ar_ahb->rtc_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk) : -ENODEV;
+ return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk);
}
return 0;
--
2.20.1.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
2020-08-14 14:48 ` Tang Bin
@ 2020-08-14 16:40 ` Tom Psyborg
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tom Psyborg @ 2020-08-14 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Bin
Cc: netdev, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, ath10k, Zhang Shengju,
davem, kvalo
On 14/08/2020, Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> @@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
> dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
>
> ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
> - return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
> }
>
> ar_ahb->ref_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_ref");
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get ref clk: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk));
> - return ar_ahb->ref_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk) : -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk);
> }
>
> ar_ahb->rtc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_rtc");
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get rtc clk: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk));
> - return ar_ahb->rtc_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk) : -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk);
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.20.1.windows.1
>
>
>
>
Hi
You should've include which HW/FW combination you tested this on
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
@ 2020-08-14 16:40 ` Tom Psyborg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tom Psyborg @ 2020-08-14 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Bin
Cc: kvalo, davem, ath10k, linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel,
Zhang Shengju
On 14/08/2020, Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> @@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
> dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
>
> ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
> - return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
> }
>
> ar_ahb->ref_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_ref");
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk)) {
> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get ref clk: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk));
> - return ar_ahb->ref_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk) : -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->ref_clk);
> }
>
> ar_ahb->rtc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_rtc");
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk)) {
> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get rtc clk: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk));
> - return ar_ahb->rtc_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk) : -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->rtc_clk);
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.20.1.windows.1
>
>
>
>
Hi
You should've include which HW/FW combination you tested this on
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
2020-08-14 14:48 ` Tang Bin
@ 2020-08-17 14:26 ` Kalle Valo
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-08-17 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Bin; +Cc: netdev, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, ath10k, davem,
Zhang Shengju
Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> writes:
> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> @@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
> dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
>
> ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
> - return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
> }
devm_clk_get() can return NULL if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled:
static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
{
return NULL;
}
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
@ 2020-08-17 14:26 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-08-17 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Bin; +Cc: davem, netdev, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, ath10k,
Zhang Shengju
Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> writes:
> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
> @@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
> dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
>
> ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
> - return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
> }
devm_clk_get() can return NULL if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled:
static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
{
return NULL;
}
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
2020-08-17 14:26 ` Kalle Valo
@ 2020-08-18 1:42 ` Tang Bin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tang Bin @ 2020-08-18 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo; +Cc: netdev, linux-wireless, davem, ath10k, linux-kernel
Hi Kalle：
在 2020/8/17 22:26, Kalle Valo 写道:
>> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
>> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
>> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
> Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
Thanks for you reply, the benefit of this patch is simplify the code,
because in
this function, I don't think the situation of 'devm_clk_get() return
NULL' exists.
So please think about it, thanks.
Tang Bin
>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
>> index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
>> @@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
>> dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
>>
>> ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
>> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
>> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
>> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
>> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
>> - return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
>> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
>> }
> devm_clk_get() can return NULL if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled:
>
> static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
@ 2020-08-18 1:42 ` Tang Bin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tang Bin @ 2020-08-18 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo; +Cc: davem, netdev, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, ath10k
Hi Kalle：
在 2020/8/17 22:26, Kalle Valo 写道:
>> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
>> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
>> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
> Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
Thanks for you reply, the benefit of this patch is simplify the code,
because in
this function, I don't think the situation of 'devm_clk_get() return
NULL' exists.
So please think about it, thanks.
Tang Bin
>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
>> index ed87bc00f..ea669af6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
>> @@ -87,24 +87,24 @@ static int ath10k_ahb_clock_init(struct ath10k *ar)
>> dev = &ar_ahb->pdev->dev;
>>
>> ar_ahb->cmd_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "wifi_wcss_cmd");
>> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
>> + if (IS_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk)) {
>> ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get cmd clk: %ld\n",
>> PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk));
>> - return ar_ahb->cmd_clk ? PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk) : -ENODEV;
>> + return PTR_ERR(ar_ahb->cmd_clk);
>> }
> devm_clk_get() can return NULL if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled:
>
> static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
2020-08-18 1:42 ` Tang Bin
@ 2020-08-18 4:40 ` Steve deRosier
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Steve deRosier @ 2020-08-18 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Bin
Cc: Network Development, linux-wireless, LKML, ath10k,
David S. Miller, Kalle Valo
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 6:43 PM Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kalle：
>
> 在 2020/8/17 22:26, Kalle Valo 写道:
> >> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
> >> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
> >> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
> > Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
> > IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
>
> Thanks for you reply, the benefit of this patch is simplify the code,
> because in
>
> this function, I don't think the situation of 'devm_clk_get() return
> NULL' exists.
>
I admit I'm not looking at HEAD, but at least in the two versions I've
got checked out, devm_clk_get() can theoretically return NULL. This
feels like a gratuitous change anyway, but in any case it's wrong and
could cause wrong behavior.
- Steve
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
@ 2020-08-18 4:40 ` Steve deRosier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Steve deRosier @ 2020-08-18 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Bin
Cc: Kalle Valo, David S. Miller, Network Development, linux-wireless,
LKML, ath10k
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 6:43 PM Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kalle：
>
> 在 2020/8/17 22:26, Kalle Valo 写道:
> >> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
> >> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
> >> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
> > Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
> > IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
>
> Thanks for you reply, the benefit of this patch is simplify the code,
> because in
>
> this function, I don't think the situation of 'devm_clk_get() return
> NULL' exists.
>
I admit I'm not looking at HEAD, but at least in the two versions I've
got checked out, devm_clk_get() can theoretically return NULL. This
feels like a gratuitous change anyway, but in any case it's wrong and
could cause wrong behavior.
- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
2020-08-18 1:42 ` Tang Bin
@ 2020-08-18 9:08 ` Kalle Valo
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-08-18 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Bin; +Cc: netdev, linux-wireless, davem, ath10k, linux-kernel
Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> writes:
> 在 2020/8/17 22:26, Kalle Valo 写道:
>>> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
>>> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
>>> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
>> Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
>> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
>
> Thanks for you reply, the benefit of this patch is simplify the code,
> because in
>
> this function, I don't think the situation of 'devm_clk_get() return
> NULL' exists.
>
> So please think about it, thanks.
I think you missed my comment below:
>> devm_clk_get() can return NULL if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled:
>>
>> static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
>> {
>> return NULL;
>> }
So I think this patch just creates a new bug and does not improve
anything.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return
@ 2020-08-18 9:08 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-08-18 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tang Bin; +Cc: netdev, linux-wireless, davem, ath10k, linux-kernel
Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> writes:
> 在 2020/8/17 22:26, Kalle Valo 写道:
>>> In the function ath10k_ahb_clock_init(), devm_clk_get() doesn't
>>> return NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() to validate
>>> the returned value instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
>> Why? What's the benefit of this patch? Or what harm does
>> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() create?
>
> Thanks for you reply, the benefit of this patch is simplify the code,
> because in
>
> this function, I don't think the situation of 'devm_clk_get() return
> NULL' exists.
>
> So please think about it, thanks.
I think you missed my comment below:
>> devm_clk_get() can return NULL if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is disabled:
>>
>> static inline struct clk *devm_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
>> {
>> return NULL;
>> }
So I think this patch just creates a new bug and does not improve
anything.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-18 9:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-14 14:48 [PATCH] ath10k: fix the status check and wrong return Tang Bin
2020-08-14 14:48 ` Tang Bin
2020-08-14 16:40 ` Tom Psyborg
2020-08-14 16:40 ` Tom Psyborg
2020-08-17 14:26 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-17 14:26 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-18 1:42 ` Tang Bin
2020-08-18 1:42 ` Tang Bin
2020-08-18 4:40 ` Steve deRosier
2020-08-18 4:40 ` Steve deRosier
2020-08-18 9:08 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-18 9:08 ` Kalle Valo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.