From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drm/drm_displayid.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:40:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2sfni66.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305110105.GA21188@embeddedor>
On Thu, 05 Mar 2020, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
> struct foo {
> int stuff;
> struct boo array[];
> };
>
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
>
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
>
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
>
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_displayid.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
> index 9d3b745c3107..94b4390bf990 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 {
>
> struct displayid_detailed_timing_block {
> struct displayid_block base;
> - struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 timings[0];
> + struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 timings[];
> };
>
> #define for_each_displayid_db(displayid, block, idx, length) \
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drm/drm_displayid.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:40:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2sfni66.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305110105.GA21188@embeddedor>
On Thu, 05 Mar 2020, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
> struct foo {
> int stuff;
> struct boo array[];
> };
>
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
>
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
>
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
>
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_displayid.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
> index 9d3b745c3107..94b4390bf990 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 {
>
> struct displayid_detailed_timing_block {
> struct displayid_block base;
> - struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 timings[0];
> + struct displayid_detailed_timings_1 timings[];
> };
>
> #define for_each_displayid_db(displayid, block, idx, length) \
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 11:01 [PATCH][next] drm/drm_displayid.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-03-05 11:01 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-03-05 11:40 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-03-05 11:40 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y2sfni66.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.