From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: bcm2835-rpi-zero-w: Drop unnecessary pinctrl
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:29:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y37d3gbv.fsf@anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548003960-4807-1-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 597 bytes --]
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> writes:
> There is no need to specify a pinctrl for the reset GPIO. So we better
> remove this avoid a potential conflict between pinctrl and pwrseq
> after the pinmux driver has been changed to strict:
>
> pinctrl-bcm2835 20200000.gpio: pin gpio41 already requested by wifi-pwrseq;
> cannot claim for pinctrl-bcm2835:499
> pinctrl-bcm2835 20200000.gpio: pin-41 (pinctrl-bcm2835:499) status -22
> pwrseq_simple: probe of wifi-pwrseq failed with error -22
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: bcm2835-rpi-zero-w: Drop unnecessary pinctrl
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:29:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y37d3gbv.fsf@anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548003960-4807-1-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 597 bytes --]
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> writes:
> There is no need to specify a pinctrl for the reset GPIO. So we better
> remove this avoid a potential conflict between pinctrl and pwrseq
> after the pinmux driver has been changed to strict:
>
> pinctrl-bcm2835 20200000.gpio: pin gpio41 already requested by wifi-pwrseq;
> cannot claim for pinctrl-bcm2835:499
> pinctrl-bcm2835 20200000.gpio: pin-41 (pinctrl-bcm2835:499) status -22
> pwrseq_simple: probe of wifi-pwrseq failed with error -22
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-21 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-20 17:06 [PATCH] ARM: dts: bcm2835-rpi-zero-w: Drop unnecessary pinctrl Stefan Wahren
2019-01-20 17:06 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-01-21 20:29 ` Eric Anholt [this message]
2019-01-21 20:29 ` Eric Anholt
2019-01-22 7:59 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-01-22 7:59 ` Stefan Wahren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y37d3gbv.fsf@anholt.net \
--to=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.