From: Esben Haabendal <eha@dev.doredevelopment.dk>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: poky <poky@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:08:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y63n5028.fsf@eha.doredevelopment.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302001365.24596.459.camel@rex> (Richard Purdie's message of "Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:02:45 +0100")
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
> of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
> least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled.
> ....
> Does this make sense to everyone, are there any questions/ objections/
> concerns/ things I've missed?
Which actual OE use-cases justify this kind of addition to OE?
I know it is on the Yocto post 1.0 schedule, but is it actually a good
thing for OE? Maintaining OE recipes is clearly not going to get any
easier with multilibs support.
/Esben
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Esben Haabendal <eha@dev.doredevelopment.dk>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: poky <poky@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:08:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y63n5028.fsf@eha.doredevelopment.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302001365.24596.459.camel@rex> (Richard Purdie's message of "Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:02:45 +0100")
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
> of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
> least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled.
> ....
> Does this make sense to everyone, are there any questions/ objections/
> concerns/ things I've missed?
Which actual OE use-cases justify this kind of addition to OE?
I know it is on the Yocto post 1.0 schedule, but is it actually a good
thing for OE? Maintaining OE recipes is clearly not going to get any
easier with multilibs support.
/Esben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 11:02 Proposed Multilib Implementation Brainstorming Richard Purdie
2011-04-05 23:28 ` Jeremy Puhlman
2011-04-06 18:53 ` Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 18:53 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 7:08 ` Esben Haabendal [this message]
2011-04-06 7:08 ` Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 12:05 ` [poky] " Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 12:05 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 12:16 ` [poky] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 12:16 ` [OE-core] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 13:06 ` [poky] " Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 13:06 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 13:21 ` [poky] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 13:21 ` [OE-core] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 14:19 ` [poky] " Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 14:19 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 16:38 ` [poky] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 16:38 ` [OE-core] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 18:01 ` [poky] " Hatle, Mark
2011-04-06 18:01 ` [OE-core] " Hatle, Mark
2011-04-06 20:54 ` [poky] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 20:54 ` [OE-core] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 20:55 ` [poky] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 20:55 ` [OE-core] " Esben Haabendal
2011-04-06 7:16 ` Koen Kooi
2011-04-06 7:16 ` [OE-core] " Koen Kooi
2011-04-06 8:47 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-04-06 14:29 ` Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 14:29 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2011-04-06 18:06 ` [poky] " Hatle, Mark
2011-04-06 18:06 ` [OE-core] " Hatle, Mark
2011-04-06 18:43 ` Tom Rini
2011-04-06 18:25 ` Tom Rini
2011-04-07 6:10 ` Koen Kooi
2011-04-06 18:26 ` Hatle, Mark
2011-04-06 18:26 ` [OE-core] " Hatle, Mark
2011-04-06 18:39 ` Tom Rini
2011-04-07 15:36 ` [poky] " Colin Walters
2011-04-07 15:36 ` Colin Walters
2011-04-07 16:10 ` [poky] " Hatle, Mark
2011-04-07 16:10 ` Hatle, Mark
2011-04-07 16:53 ` [poky] " Colin Walters
2011-04-07 16:53 ` Colin Walters
2011-04-07 17:04 ` [poky] " Hatle, Mark
2011-04-07 17:04 ` Hatle, Mark
2011-04-07 17:10 ` [poky] " Hatle, Mark
2011-04-07 17:10 ` Hatle, Mark
2011-04-07 17:07 ` [poky] " Koen Kooi
2011-04-07 17:07 ` Koen Kooi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y63n5028.fsf@eha.doredevelopment.dk \
--to=eha@dev.doredevelopment.dk \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=poky@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.