[Buildroot] Target uClibc test fail vector

[Buildroot] Target uClibc test fail vector

[Michael S. Zick]

Anyone know if this is a reasonable set of failing tests?
Any link anywhere to the expected test pass/fail sets for this library?

My results:

deb2core:/mnt/sqf1/lib# file libuClibc-0.9.30.1.so

libuClibc-0.9.30.1.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, MIPS, MIPS32 rel2
version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs),
with unknown capability 0xf41 = 0x756e6700, stripped

TESTS_DISABLED=

tst-ethers-line
tst-ethers
tst_iswctype
tst_swscanf
tst_towctrans
tst_wcrtomb
tst_wcscoll
tst_wcsrtombs
tst_wcstod
tst_wcstombs
tst_wctrans
tst_wctype
tst_strfmon
bug-iconv-trans
bug-usesetlocale
collate-test
gen-unicode-ctype
dump-ctype
tst-ctype
tst-digits
tst-fmon
tst-langinfo
tst-leaks
tst-numeric
tst-rpmatch
tst-sscanf
tst-strmon1
tst-strfmon1
tst-trans
tst-wctype
tst-xlocale1
tst-xlocale2
xfrm-test
time_malloc
test-float
test-ifloat
test-double
test-idouble
bug-glob1
outb
tst-fnmatch
tst-gnuglob
mmap2
cancellation-points
tst-sigsimple
bug-asctime
bug
-asctime_r
time
tst-ftime_l
testregexi
tst-mktime2
tst-posixtz
tst-strftime
tst-strptime
tst-timezone
tst_wcsftime
exec-null


Mike

[Buildroot] Target uClibc test fail vector

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Michael" == Michael S Zick <minimod@morethan.org> writes:

 Michael> Anyone know if this is a reasonable set of failing tests?  Any
 Michael> link anywhere to the expected test pass/fail sets for this
 Michael> library?

Sorry, I don't. You might have more luck asking on the uClibc list.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] Target uClibc test fail vector

[Michael S. Zick]

On Sun November 29 2009, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael S Zick <minimod@morethan.org> writes:
> 
>  Michael> Anyone know if this is a reasonable set of failing tests?  Any
>  Michael> link anywhere to the expected test pass/fail sets for this
>  Michael> library?
> 
> Sorry, I don't. You might have more luck asking on the uClibc list.
> 

good point.

Will hold off on that for now - will just keep this as a "before" run -
before I diddle the config menu for all of those compiler options.

It reads as if nobody cared about MIPS since the turn of the century,
none of the 21st century cores have more than a passing mention.

It needs a bit more loving care, what worked for 2.95 might have been
good, back in its time...

Mike