From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: Use huge_ptep_get() in gup_hugepte()
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:14:05 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zh91dbki.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ffc3714334c3bfaca6f13788ad039e8759ae413f.1592225558.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> gup_hugepte() reads hugepage table entries, it can't read
> them directly, huge_ptep_get() must be used.
>
> Fixes: 2ab3a0a02905 ("READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses")
I see that commit in older versions of linux-next but not in mainline.
In mainline it seems to be: 9e343b467c70 ("READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses")
I guess it got rebased somewhere along the way.
I fixed it up when applying, and the other two as well.
cheers
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index de9e36262ccb..761df4944ef5 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -2425,7 +2425,7 @@ static int gup_hugepte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long sz, unsigned long addr,
> if (pte_end < end)
> end = pte_end;
>
> - pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> + pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
>
> if (!pte_access_permitted(pte, flags & FOLL_WRITE))
> return 0;
> --
> 2.25.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: Use huge_ptep_get() in gup_hugepte()
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:14:05 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zh91dbki.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ffc3714334c3bfaca6f13788ad039e8759ae413f.1592225558.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> gup_hugepte() reads hugepage table entries, it can't read
> them directly, huge_ptep_get() must be used.
>
> Fixes: 2ab3a0a02905 ("READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses")
I see that commit in older versions of linux-next but not in mainline.
In mainline it seems to be: 9e343b467c70 ("READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses")
I guess it got rebased somewhere along the way.
I fixed it up when applying, and the other two as well.
cheers
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index de9e36262ccb..761df4944ef5 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -2425,7 +2425,7 @@ static int gup_hugepte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long sz, unsigned long addr,
> if (pte_end < end)
> end = pte_end;
>
> - pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> + pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
>
> if (!pte_access_permitted(pte, flags & FOLL_WRITE))
> return 0;
> --
> 2.25.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 12:57 [PATCH 0/3] Fix build failure with v5.8-rc1 Christophe Leroy
2020-06-15 12:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-15 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: Use huge_ptep_get() in gup_hugepte() Christophe Leroy
2020-06-15 12:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-17 14:14 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2020-06-17 14:14 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-15 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: Allow arches to provide ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2020-06-15 12:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-15 12:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/8xx: Provide ptep_get() with 16k pages Christophe Leroy
2020-06-15 12:57 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-15 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-15 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 14:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-17 14:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-17 14:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 14:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-17 14:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-17 14:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-18 1:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-18 1:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-18 14:19 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-18 14:19 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-18 0:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-18 0:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-18 14:21 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-18 14:21 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-17 10:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix build failure with v5.8-rc1 Will Deacon
2020-06-17 10:57 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-17 14:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-17 14:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-18 12:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-18 12:37 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zh91dbki.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.