From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pkeys: Reserve PKEY_DISABLE_READ
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:57:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhtuhgx0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127102350.GA5795@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> (Ram Pai's message of "Tue, 27 Nov 2018 02:23:50 -0800")
* Ram Pai:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> index d4a8d04..e9b121b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
> ((key) & 0x2 ? VM_PKEY_BIT1 : 0) | \
> ((key) & 0x4 ? VM_PKEY_BIT2 : 0) | \
> ((key) & 0x8 ? VM_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
> +
> +/* Override any generic PKEY permission defines */
> +#undef PKEY_ACCESS_MASK
> +#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
> + PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
> #endif
I would have expected something that translates PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE |
PKEY_DISABLE_READ into PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS, and also accepts
PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_READ, for consistency with POWER.
(My understanding is that PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS does not disable all
access, but produces execute-only memory.)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> index e7ee328..61168e4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@
>
> #define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS 0x1
> #define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE 0x2
> -#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
> - PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
> -
> +#define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE 0x4
> +#define PKEY_DISABLE_READ 0x8
> +#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK 0x0 /* arch can override and define its own
> + mask bits */
> #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_MMAN_COMMON_H */
I think Dave requested a value for PKEY_DISABLE_READ which is further
away from the existing bits.
Thanks,
Florian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: pkeys: Reserve PKEY_DISABLE_READ
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:57:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhtuhgx0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127102350.GA5795@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> (Ram Pai's message of "Tue, 27 Nov 2018 02:23:50 -0800")
* Ram Pai:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> index d4a8d04..e9b121b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
> ((key) & 0x2 ? VM_PKEY_BIT1 : 0) | \
> ((key) & 0x4 ? VM_PKEY_BIT2 : 0) | \
> ((key) & 0x8 ? VM_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
> +
> +/* Override any generic PKEY permission defines */
> +#undef PKEY_ACCESS_MASK
> +#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
> + PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
> #endif
I would have expected something that translates PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE |
PKEY_DISABLE_READ into PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS, and also accepts
PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_READ, for consistency with POWER.
(My understanding is that PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS does not disable all
access, but produces execute-only memory.)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> index e7ee328..61168e4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@
>
> #define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS 0x1
> #define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE 0x2
> -#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
> - PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
> -
> +#define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE 0x4
> +#define PKEY_DISABLE_READ 0x8
> +#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK 0x0 /* arch can override and define its own
> + mask bits */
> #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_MMAN_COMMON_H */
I think Dave requested a value for PKEY_DISABLE_READ which is further
away from the existing bits.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-27 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 12:05 pkeys: Reserve PKEY_DISABLE_READ Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 14:57 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 15:01 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 17:14 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 17:37 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 20:12 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:12 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:23 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 20:23 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-09 18:09 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-09 18:09 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-12 12:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-12 12:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-27 10:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-27 10:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-27 11:57 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2018-11-27 11:57 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-27 15:31 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-27 15:31 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-29 11:37 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-29 11:37 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-03 4:02 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-03 4:02 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-03 15:52 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-03 15:52 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-04 6:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-04 6:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-05 13:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-05 13:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-12-05 20:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-05 20:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-05 16:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-05 16:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-12-05 20:36 ` Ram Pai
2018-12-05 20:36 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:08 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 20:11 ` Dave Hansen
2018-11-08 20:14 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-08 19:22 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-08 19:22 ` Ram Pai
2018-11-12 10:29 ` Florian Weimer
2018-11-12 10:29 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zhtuhgx0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.