From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m@bues.ch, mpm@selenic.com,
amit.shah@redhat.com, mb@bu3sch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] hw_random: use reference counts on each struct hwrng.
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:11:23 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjbxm6fw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415030186-18303-4-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com>
Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com> writes:
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> current_rng holds one reference, and we bump it every time we want
> to do a read from it.
>
> This means we only hold the rng_mutex to grab or drop a reference,
> so accessing /sys/devices/virtual/misc/hw_random/rng_current doesn't
> block on read of /dev/hwrng.
>
> Using a kref is overkill (we're always under the rng_mutex), but
> a standard pattern.
>
> This also solves the problem that the hwrng_fillfn thread was
> accessing current_rng without a lock, which could change (eg. to NULL)
> underneath it.
>
> v4: decrease last reference for triggering the cleanup
This doesn't make any sense:
> +static void drop_current_rng(void)
> +{
> + struct hwrng *rng = current_rng;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&rng_mutex));
> + if (!current_rng)
> + return;
> +
> + /* release current_rng reference */
> + kref_put(¤t_rng->ref, cleanup_rng);
> + current_rng = NULL;
> +
> + /* decrease last reference for triggering the cleanup */
> + kref_put(&rng->ref, cleanup_rng);
> +}
Why would it drop the refcount twice? This doesn't make sense.
Hmm, because you added kref_init, which initializes the reference count
to 1, you created this bug.
Leave out the kref_init, and let it naturally be 0 (until, and if, it
becomes current_rng). Add a comment if you want.
Thanks,
Rusty.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, m@bues.ch,
mb@bu3sch.de, mpm@selenic.com, amit.shah@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] hw_random: use reference counts on each struct hwrng.
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:11:23 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjbxm6fw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415030186-18303-4-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com>
Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com> writes:
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> current_rng holds one reference, and we bump it every time we want
> to do a read from it.
>
> This means we only hold the rng_mutex to grab or drop a reference,
> so accessing /sys/devices/virtual/misc/hw_random/rng_current doesn't
> block on read of /dev/hwrng.
>
> Using a kref is overkill (we're always under the rng_mutex), but
> a standard pattern.
>
> This also solves the problem that the hwrng_fillfn thread was
> accessing current_rng without a lock, which could change (eg. to NULL)
> underneath it.
>
> v4: decrease last reference for triggering the cleanup
This doesn't make any sense:
> +static void drop_current_rng(void)
> +{
> + struct hwrng *rng = current_rng;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&rng_mutex));
> + if (!current_rng)
> + return;
> +
> + /* release current_rng reference */
> + kref_put(¤t_rng->ref, cleanup_rng);
> + current_rng = NULL;
> +
> + /* decrease last reference for triggering the cleanup */
> + kref_put(&rng->ref, cleanup_rng);
> +}
Why would it drop the refcount twice? This doesn't make sense.
Hmm, because you added kref_init, which initializes the reference count
to 1, you created this bug.
Leave out the kref_init, and let it naturally be 0 (until, and if, it
becomes current_rng). Add a comment if you want.
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-03 15:56 [PATCH v4 0/6] fix hw_random stuck Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] hw_random: place mutex around read functions and buffers Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] hw_random: move some code out mutex_lock for avoiding underlying deadlock Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] hw_random: use reference counts on each struct hwrng Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-12 3:41 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2014-11-12 3:41 ` Rusty Russell
2014-11-17 15:20 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-17 15:20 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] hw_random: fix unregister race Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-10 13:47 ` Herbert Xu
2014-11-10 13:47 ` Herbert Xu
2014-11-12 4:47 ` Herbert Xu
2014-11-12 4:47 ` Herbert Xu
2014-11-12 4:03 ` Rusty Russell
2014-11-12 4:03 ` Rusty Russell
2014-11-25 7:42 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-25 7:42 ` Amos Kong
2014-12-06 3:51 ` Amos Kong
2014-12-06 3:51 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] hw_random: don't double-check old_rng Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] hw_random: don't init list element we're about to add to list Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` Amos Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zjbxm6fw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@bues.ch \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.