From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: "Aguirre, Sergio" <saaguirre@ti.com>
Cc: "me@felipebalbi.com" <me@felipebalbi.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pandita, Vikram" <vikram.pandita@ti.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 04/10] OMAP clock: Add uart4_ick/fck definitions for 3630
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:40:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zl2isd9i.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A24693684029E5489D1D202277BE894453E4CF8E@dlee02.ent.ti.com> (Sergio Aguirre's message of "Mon\, 8 Mar 2010 14\:30\:16 -0600")
"Aguirre, Sergio" <saaguirre@ti.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:me@felipebalbi.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 12:29 PM
>> To: Aguirre, Sergio
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Kevin Hilman; Pandita, Vikram; Paul
>> Walmsley; Tony Lindgren
>> Subject: Re: [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 04/10] OMAP clock: Add
>> uart4_ick/fck definitions for 3630
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:28:46AM -0600, Sergio Aguirre wrote:
>> > @@ -3420,6 +3440,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap3xxx_clks[] = {
>> > CLK(NULL, "per_96m_fck", &per_96m_fck, CK_3XXX),
>> > CLK(NULL, "per_48m_fck", &per_48m_fck, CK_3XXX),
>> > CLK(NULL, "uart3_fck", &uart3_fck, CK_3XXX),
>> > + CLK(NULL, "uart4_fck", &uart4_fck, CK_36XX),
>> > CLK(NULL, "gpt2_fck", &gpt2_fck, CK_3XXX),
>> > CLK(NULL, "gpt3_fck", &gpt3_fck, CK_3XXX),
>> > CLK(NULL, "gpt4_fck", &gpt4_fck, CK_3XXX),
>> > @@ -3443,6 +3464,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap3xxx_clks[] = {
>> > CLK(NULL, "gpio2_ick", &gpio2_ick, CK_3XXX),
>> > CLK(NULL, "wdt3_ick", &wdt3_ick, CK_3XXX),
>> > CLK(NULL, "uart3_ick", &uart3_ick, CK_3XXX),
>> > + CLK(NULL, "uart4_ick", &uart4_ick, CK_36XX),
>>
>> are the uart clocks shared ? Why not defining the devname here if
>> they're not ? We would loop less to find the clock that way.
>
> I think I'll better wait for hwmod changes, since seems this could change.
> (Kevin, correct me if I'm wrong.)
I agree, hwmod will take care of the clocks.
Kevin
> Anyways, maybe this needs to be handled by a separate patch, to assign all uart clocks, from 1 to 4, to a specific device.
>
> Regards,
> Sergio
>
>>
>> --
>> balbi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-08 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-08 17:28 [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 00/10] omap2/3/4: uart4 fixes + zoom2/3 changes Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 01/10] OMAP3: serial: Check for zero-based physical addr Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 18:24 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-08 20:28 ` Aguirre, Sergio
2010-03-08 21:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 02/10] omap2/3/4: serial: Remove condition for getting uart4_phys Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 03/10] ARM: OMAP3630: PRCM: Add UART4 control bits Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 04/10] OMAP clock: Add uart4_ick/fck definitions for 3630 Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 18:28 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-08 20:30 ` Aguirre, Sergio
2010-03-08 21:40 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 05/10] OMAP3: PRCM: Consider UART4 for 3630 chip in prcm_setup_regs Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 17:55 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-08 18:01 ` Aguirre, Sergio
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 06/10] omap3: serial: Fix uart4 handling for 3630 Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 07/10] omap3: zoom2/3 / 3630sdp: Don't init always all uarts Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 08/10] omap3: 3630sdp: Explicitly enable all UARTs Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 09/10] omap3: zoom 2/3: Change debugboard serial port id Sergio Aguirre
2010-03-08 17:59 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-03-08 18:02 ` Aguirre, Sergio
2010-03-08 17:28 ` [RFC part1/2 merge v2 RESEND][PATCH 10/10] omap3: zoom2/3: Register only 1 8250 port Sergio Aguirre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zl2isd9i.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=saaguirre@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vikram.pandita@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.