From: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@codeaurora.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:29:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <891f28e4c1f3c24ed1b257de83cbb3a0@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210518163304.3702015-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
On 2021-05-18 09:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> removed. So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around
> by
> just getting rid of them entirely.
>
> By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
> storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
> up.
Question not about this specific change, but the general concept
of keeping (or not keeping) dentry pointers. In the ath drivers,
as well as in an out-of-tree driver for Android, we keep a
debugfs dentry pointer to use as a param to relay_open().
Will we still be able to have a dentry pointer for this purpose?
Or better, is there a recommended way to get a dentry pointer
NOT associated with debugfs at all (which would be ideal for
Android where debugfs is disabled).
Thanks,
Jeff
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@codeaurora.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:29:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <891f28e4c1f3c24ed1b257de83cbb3a0@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210518163304.3702015-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
On 2021-05-18 09:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> removed. So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around
> by
> just getting rid of them entirely.
>
> By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
> storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
> up.
Question not about this specific change, but the general concept
of keeping (or not keeping) dentry pointers. In the ath drivers,
as well as in an out-of-tree driver for Android, we keep a
debugfs dentry pointer to use as a param to relay_open().
Will we still be able to have a dentry pointer for this purpose?
Or better, is there a recommended way to get a dentry pointer
NOT associated with debugfs at all (which would be ideal for
Android where debugfs is disabled).
Thanks,
Jeff
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-18 16:33 [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-18 16:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-18 17:47 ` Kalle Valo
2021-05-18 17:47 ` Kalle Valo
2021-05-21 18:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-21 18:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-18 19:29 ` Jeff Johnson [this message]
2021-05-18 19:29 ` Jeff Johnson
2021-05-18 22:00 ` Jeff Johnson
2021-05-18 22:00 ` Jeff Johnson
2021-05-19 5:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-19 5:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-19 15:04 ` Jeff Johnson
2021-05-19 15:04 ` Jeff Johnson
2021-05-19 15:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-19 15:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-19 15:57 ` Jeff Johnson
2021-05-19 15:57 ` Jeff Johnson
2021-05-19 16:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-19 16:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-20 22:16 ` Jeff Johnson
2021-05-21 5:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=891f28e4c1f3c24ed1b257de83cbb3a0@codeaurora.org \
--to=jjohnson@codeaurora.org \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.