* [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix comments about CHV snoop behaviour
@ 2014-11-14 19:02 ville.syrjala
2014-11-14 19:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-11-15 9:22 ` shuang.he
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ville.syrjala @ 2014-11-14 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Replace the misinformed notes about CHV snoop behaviour with something
that's hopefully closer to reality.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index d8a08a2..a9f499c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -1953,9 +1953,17 @@ static void chv_setup_private_ppat(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
* Only the snoop bit has meaning for CHV, the rest is
* ignored.
*
- * Note that the harware enforces snooping for all page
- * table accesses. The snoop bit is actually ignored for
- * PDEs.
+ * The hardware will never snoop for certain types of accesses:
+ * - CPU GTT (GMADR->GGTT->no snoop->memory)
+ * - PPGTT page tables
+ * - some other special cycles
+ *
+ * As with BDW, we also need to consider the following for GT accesses:
+ * "For GGTT, there is NO pat_sel[2:0] from the entry,
+ * so RTL will always use the value corresponding to
+ * pat_sel = 000".
+ * Which means we must set the snoop bit in PAT entry 0
+ * in order to keep the global status page working.
*/
pat = GEN8_PPAT(0, CHV_PPAT_SNOOP) |
GEN8_PPAT(1, 0) |
--
2.0.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix comments about CHV snoop behaviour
2014-11-14 19:02 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix comments about CHV snoop behaviour ville.syrjala
@ 2014-11-14 19:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-11-15 9:22 ` shuang.he
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2014-11-14 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ville.syrjala; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 09:02:44PM +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Replace the misinformed notes about CHV snoop behaviour with something
> that's hopefully closer to reality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix comments about CHV snoop behaviour
2014-11-14 19:02 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix comments about CHV snoop behaviour ville.syrjala
2014-11-14 19:07 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2014-11-15 9:22 ` shuang.he
2014-11-17 15:04 ` Daniel Vetter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: shuang.he @ 2014-11-15 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shuang.he, intel-gfx, ville.syrjala
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate->patch_applied_pass_rate
BYT: pass/total=290/291->290/291
PNV: pass/total=352/356->356/356
ILK: pass/total=371/372->371/372
IVB: pass/total=545/546->544/546
SNB: pass/total=424/425->424/425
HSW: pass/total=579/579->579/579
BDW: pass/total=434/435->434/435
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
test_platform: test_suite, test_case, result_with_drm_intel_nightly(count, machine_id...)...->result_with_patch_applied(count, machine_id)...
PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_mixed_blits, DMESG_WARN(1, M23) -> PASS(4, M23)
PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_mixed_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)
PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_tiledx_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)
PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_tiledy_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)
IVB: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_cursor_crc_cursor-128x128-random, PASS(1, M4) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M21)PASS(3, M21)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix comments about CHV snoop behaviour
2014-11-15 9:22 ` shuang.he
@ 2014-11-17 15:04 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2014-11-17 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shuang.he; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 01:22:46AM -0800, shuang.he@intel.com wrote:
> Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
> -------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
> Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate->patch_applied_pass_rate
> BYT: pass/total=290/291->290/291
> PNV: pass/total=352/356->356/356
> ILK: pass/total=371/372->371/372
> IVB: pass/total=545/546->544/546
> SNB: pass/total=424/425->424/425
> HSW: pass/total=579/579->579/579
> BDW: pass/total=434/435->434/435
> -------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
> test_platform: test_suite, test_case, result_with_drm_intel_nightly(count, machine_id...)...->result_with_patch_applied(count, machine_id)...
> PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_mixed_blits, DMESG_WARN(1, M23) -> PASS(4, M23)
> PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_mixed_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)
> PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_tiledx_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)
> PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_tiledy_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)
These tests on pnv seem to be unstable and flip-flop between crash, dmesg
warn and pass. Is the machine dying perhaps or should we have some
additional filtering in -nightly results?
-Daniel
> IVB: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_cursor_crc_cursor-128x128-random, PASS(1, M4) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M21)PASS(3, M21)
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-17 15:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-14 19:02 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix comments about CHV snoop behaviour ville.syrjala
2014-11-14 19:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-11-15 9:22 ` shuang.he
2014-11-17 15:04 ` Daniel Vetter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.