* iptables -F
@ 2005-08-09 23:18 Shannon Roddy
2005-08-10 17:21 ` Alessandro O. Ungaro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shannon Roddy @ 2005-08-09 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Can someone help me out here? I figured that iptables -F would flush
all tables including the nat table, but it appears to not flush it. I
have to explicitly use iptables -t nat -F to fllush the NAT rules.
Thanks,
Shannon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: iptables -F
2005-08-09 23:18 iptables -F Shannon Roddy
@ 2005-08-10 17:21 ` Alessandro O. Ungaro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro O. Ungaro @ 2005-08-10 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Shannon,
when you use the iptables command and no specify the table, it assumes
that the table is filter, so "iptables -t filter -F" is the same as
"iptables -F". That's why you need to specify the table to flush the
nat, like flush mangle, etc...
best regards,
x-arnie
Shannon Roddy wrote:
> Can someone help me out here? I figured that iptables -F would flush
> all tables including the nat table, but it appears to not flush it. I
> have to explicitly use iptables -t nat -F to fllush the NAT rules.
>
> Thanks,
> Shannon
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-10 17:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-09 23:18 iptables -F Shannon Roddy
2005-08-10 17:21 ` Alessandro O. Ungaro
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.