All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Hoyeon Lee <hoyeon.lee@suse.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next v1 1/5] selftests/bpf: use sockaddr_storage instead of addr_port in cls_redirect test
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:57:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8edc1bae-8a28-4d8b-bf52-249bea05537f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7-dKbxgFqw8cjfw3oWvZCQat=UKUq7u4zU+nx4xw-g5m4n_Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/18/25 7:09 PM, Hoyeon Lee wrote:
> For the “family” field, agreed. ss_family is sufficient, and the tuple
> wrapper can be removed. If you're okay with that direction, I can drop
> the family field and resend patches 1 and 2 with that cleanup applied.

Please re-spin patch 1 and 2 with the 'struct tuple' cleanup. The 
patch's title should have "PATCH bpf-next v???". Take a look at other 
patches posted in the mailing list.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-15 22:55 [bpf-next v1 0/5] selftests/bpf: networking test cleanups and build fix Hoyeon Lee
2025-11-15 22:55 ` [bpf-next v1 1/5] selftests/bpf: use sockaddr_storage instead of addr_port in cls_redirect test Hoyeon Lee
2025-11-18 23:12   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-19  3:09     ` Hoyeon Lee
2025-11-19 16:57       ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-11-15 22:55 ` [bpf-next v1 2/5] selftests/bpf: use sockaddr_storage instead of sa46 in select_reuseport test Hoyeon Lee
2025-11-15 22:55 ` [bpf-next v1 3/5] selftests/bpf: move common TCP helpers into bpf_tracing_net.h Hoyeon Lee
2025-11-15 22:55 ` [bpf-next v1 4/5] selftests/bpf: replace TCP CC string comparisons with bpf_strncmp Hoyeon Lee
2025-11-15 22:55 ` [bpf-next v1 5/5] selftests/bpf: propagate LLVM toolchain to runqslower build Hoyeon Lee
2025-11-17  6:04   ` Yonghong Song
2025-11-17  6:37     ` Hoyeon Lee
2025-11-17 23:16 ` [bpf-next v1 0/5] selftests/bpf: networking test cleanups and build fix Amery Hung
2025-11-18 23:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8edc1bae-8a28-4d8b-bf52-249bea05537f@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hoyeon.lee@suse.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.