From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmcore: allow alternate dump capturing methods to export vmcore without is_kdump_kernel()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 20:04:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fcd7ba7-0f27-7bbc-676f-7e13c8bf00d7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPP/UeP1zUbGPzrt@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Hi Baoquan,
Thanks for the review...
On 03/09/23 9:06 am, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Hari,
>
> On 09/02/23 at 12:34am, Hari Bathini wrote:
>> Currently, is_kdump_kernel() returns true when elfcorehdr_addr is set.
>> While elfcorehdr_addr is set for kexec based kernel dump mechanism,
>> alternate dump capturing methods like fadump [1] also set it to export
>> the vmcore. is_kdump_kernel() is used to restrict resources in crash
>> dump capture kernel but such restrictions may not be desirable for
>> fadump. Allow is_kdump_kernel() to be defined differently for such
>> scenarios. With this, is_kdump_kernel() could be false while vmcore
>> is usable. So, introduce is_crashdump_kernel() to return true when
>> elfcorehdr_addr is set and use it for vmcore related checks.
>
> I got what is done in these two patches, but didn't get why they need be
> done. vmcore_unusable()/is_vmcore_usable() are only unitilized in ia64.
> Why do you care if it's is_crashdump_kernel() or is_kdump_kernel()?
> If you want to override the generic is_kdump_kernel() with powerpc's own
> is_kdump_kernel(), your below change is enough to allow you to do that.
> I can't see why is_crashdump_kernel() is needed. Could you explain that
> specifically?
You mean to just remove is_kdump_kernel() check in is_vmcore_usable() &
vmcore_unusable() functions? Replaced generic is_crashdump_kernel()
function instead, that returns true for any dump capturing method,
irrespective of whether is_kdump_kernel() returns true or false.
For fadump case, is_kdump_kernel() will return false after patch 2/2.
Thanks
Hari
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmcore: allow alternate dump capturing methods to export vmcore without is_kdump_kernel()
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 20:04:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fcd7ba7-0f27-7bbc-676f-7e13c8bf00d7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPP/UeP1zUbGPzrt@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Hi Baoquan,
Thanks for the review...
On 03/09/23 9:06 am, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Hari,
>
> On 09/02/23 at 12:34am, Hari Bathini wrote:
>> Currently, is_kdump_kernel() returns true when elfcorehdr_addr is set.
>> While elfcorehdr_addr is set for kexec based kernel dump mechanism,
>> alternate dump capturing methods like fadump [1] also set it to export
>> the vmcore. is_kdump_kernel() is used to restrict resources in crash
>> dump capture kernel but such restrictions may not be desirable for
>> fadump. Allow is_kdump_kernel() to be defined differently for such
>> scenarios. With this, is_kdump_kernel() could be false while vmcore
>> is usable. So, introduce is_crashdump_kernel() to return true when
>> elfcorehdr_addr is set and use it for vmcore related checks.
>
> I got what is done in these two patches, but didn't get why they need be
> done. vmcore_unusable()/is_vmcore_usable() are only unitilized in ia64.
> Why do you care if it's is_crashdump_kernel() or is_kdump_kernel()?
> If you want to override the generic is_kdump_kernel() with powerpc's own
> is_kdump_kernel(), your below change is enough to allow you to do that.
> I can't see why is_crashdump_kernel() is needed. Could you explain that
> specifically?
You mean to just remove is_kdump_kernel() check in is_vmcore_usable() &
vmcore_unusable() functions? Replaced generic is_crashdump_kernel()
function instead, that returns true for any dump capturing method,
irrespective of whether is_kdump_kernel() returns true or false.
For fadump case, is_kdump_kernel() will return false after patch 2/2.
Thanks
Hari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-04 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 19:04 [PATCH 1/2] vmcore: allow alternate dump capturing methods to export vmcore without is_kdump_kernel() Hari Bathini
2023-09-01 19:04 ` Hari Bathini
2023-09-01 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/fadump: make is_kdump_kernel() return false when fadump is active Hari Bathini
2023-09-01 19:04 ` Hari Bathini
2023-09-03 3:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] vmcore: allow alternate dump capturing methods to export vmcore without is_kdump_kernel() Baoquan He
2023-09-03 3:36 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-04 14:34 ` Hari Bathini [this message]
2023-09-04 14:34 ` Hari Bathini
2023-09-05 2:30 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-05 2:30 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-05 19:25 ` Hari Bathini
2023-09-05 19:25 ` Hari Bathini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fcd7ba7-0f27-7bbc-676f-7e13c8bf00d7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.