From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] drivers/iommu/ relocations
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:23:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8yar574klo1.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110608093546.GG4407@amd.com> (Joerg Roedel's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:35:46 +0200")
On Wed, Jun 08 2011, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> Great, thanks. I'll apply the patches as soon as the relevant ACKs come
> in. Looking at the MAINTAINERS file David Brown needs to ACK the MSM
> patch and David Woodhouse the VT-d patch.
>
> David B., David W., is this direction ok for both of you?
I think it is a good direction to move in. I'll reply to the patch
directly to comment on it.
> My suggestion is that the ARM tree pulls in the necessary changes from
> the IOMMU tree and the IOMMU code goes upstream through Ingo or directly
> to Linus (with some time in linux-next, of course). Thoughts?
This seems the cleanest to me.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] drivers/iommu/ relocations
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:23:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8yar574klo1.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110608093546.GG4407@amd.com> (Joerg Roedel's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:35:46 +0200")
On Wed, Jun 08 2011, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> Great, thanks. I'll apply the patches as soon as the relevant ACKs come
> in. Looking at the MAINTAINERS file David Brown needs to ACK the MSM
> patch and David Woodhouse the VT-d patch.
>
> David B., David W., is this direction ok for both of you?
I think it is a good direction to move in. I'll reply to the patch
directly to comment on it.
> My suggestion is that the ARM tree pulls in the necessary changes from
> the IOMMU tree and the IOMMU code goes upstream through Ingo or directly
> to Linus (with some time in linux-next, of course). Thoughts?
This seems the cleanest to me.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
To: "Roedel\, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
"linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"iommu\@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-pci\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] drivers/iommu/ relocations
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:23:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8yar574klo1.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110608093546.GG4407@amd.com> (Joerg Roedel's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:35:46 +0200")
On Wed, Jun 08 2011, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> Great, thanks. I'll apply the patches as soon as the relevant ACKs come
> in. Looking at the MAINTAINERS file David Brown needs to ACK the MSM
> patch and David Woodhouse the VT-d patch.
>
> David B., David W., is this direction ok for both of you?
I think it is a good direction to move in. I'll reply to the patch
directly to comment on it.
> My suggestion is that the ARM tree pulls in the necessary changes from
> the IOMMU tree and the IOMMU code goes upstream through Ingo or directly
> to Linus (with some time in linux-next, of course). Thoughts?
This seems the cleanest to me.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 8:34 [PATCH 0/4] drivers/iommu/ relocations Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] drivers: iommu: move to a dedicated folder Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] msm: iommu: move to drivers/iommu/ Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 22:27 ` David Brown
2011-06-08 22:27 ` David Brown
2011-06-08 22:27 ` David Brown
2011-06-10 16:24 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-10 16:24 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: amd_iommu: " Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: intel-iommu: " Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 8:34 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 9:17 ` David Woodhouse
2011-06-08 9:17 ` David Woodhouse
2011-06-08 9:38 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-06-08 9:38 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-06-08 10:33 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 10:33 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 17:47 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-08 17:47 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-08 17:47 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-08 19:35 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 19:35 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 9:35 ` [PATCH 0/4] drivers/iommu/ relocations Roedel, Joerg
2011-06-08 9:35 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-06-08 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-08 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-08 22:23 ` David Brown [this message]
2011-06-08 22:23 ` David Brown
2011-06-08 22:23 ` David Brown
2011-06-08 13:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-06-08 13:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-06-08 13:11 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 13:11 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2011-06-08 13:35 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-06-08 13:35 ` Roedel, Joerg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8yar574klo1.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com \
--to=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.