Re: [PATCH] object-file: reprepare alternates when necessary

[Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>]

On 3/6/2023 7:28 PM, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:54:00PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> @@ -1008,6 +1008,7 @@ void reprepare_packed_git(struct repository *r)
>>>  	struct object_directory *odb;
>>>
>>>  	obj_read_lock();
>>> +	reprepare_alt_odb(r);
>>>  	for (odb = r->objects->odb; odb; odb = odb->next)
>>>  		odb_clear_loose_cache(odb);
>>
>> Hmph, if there was an old alternate ODB from which we took some
>> loose object from and cached, and if that ODB no longer is on the
>> updated alternate list, would we now fail to clear the loose objects
>> cache for the ODB?  Or are we only prepared for seeing "more"
>> alternates and assume no existing alternates go away?
> 
> Based on my understanding of the patch, we are only prepared to see
> "more" alternates, rather than some existing alternate going away.
> 
> That being said, I am not certain that is how it works. Perhaps an
> alternate "goes away", but does not actually get removed from the list
> of alternate ODBs. If that's the case, any object lookup in that
> now-missing ODB would fail, but any subsequent ODBs which were added
> after calling reprepare_alt_odb() would succeed on that object lookup.
> 
> So, I don't know. I don't have the implementation details of the
> alternates ODB mechanism paged in enough to say for sure. Hopefully
> Stolee can point us in the right direction.

The prepare_alt_odb() call only _adds_ to the linked odb list. It
will not remove any existing ODBs. Adding this reprepare_*() method
makes it such that we can use the union of the alternates available
across the lifetime of the process.

Thanks,
-Stolee