All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:57:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90316f17-e853-fd23-2ec2-4d03cf283b0b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4272eaf5-b654-2669-62ac-ba768acd6b91@amd.com>



On 8/19/21 11:33 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> There was some talk about this on the mailing list where TDX and SEV may
> need to be differentiated, so we wanted to reserve a range of values per
> technology. I guess I can remove them until they are actually needed.

In TDX also we have similar requirements and we need some flags for
TDX specific checks. So I think it is fine to leave some space for vendor
flags.

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:57:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90316f17-e853-fd23-2ec2-4d03cf283b0b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4272eaf5-b654-2669-62ac-ba768acd6b91@amd.com>



On 8/19/21 11:33 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> There was some talk about this on the mailing list where TDX and SEV may
> need to be differentiated, so we wanted to reserve a range of values per
> technology. I guess I can remove them until they are actually needed.

In TDX also we have similar requirements and we need some flags for
TDX specific checks. So I think it is fine to leave some space for vendor
flags.

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:57:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90316f17-e853-fd23-2ec2-4d03cf283b0b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4272eaf5-b654-2669-62ac-ba768acd6b91@amd.com>



On 8/19/21 11:33 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> There was some talk about this on the mailing list where TDX and SEV may
> need to be differentiated, so we wanted to reserve a range of values per
> technology. I guess I can remove them until they are actually needed.

In TDX also we have similar requirements and we need some flags for
TDX specific checks. So I think it is fine to leave some space for vendor
flags.

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:57:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90316f17-e853-fd23-2ec2-4d03cf283b0b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4272eaf5-b654-2669-62ac-ba768acd6b91@amd.com>



On 8/19/21 11:33 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> There was some talk about this on the mailing list where TDX and SEV may
> need to be differentiated, so we wanted to reserve a range of values per
> technology. I guess I can remove them until they are actually needed.

In TDX also we have similar requirements and we need some flags for
TDX specific checks. So I think it is fine to leave some space for vendor
flags.

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-19 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 180+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-13 16:59 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] x86/ioremap: Selectively build arch override encryption functions Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-14 15:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 15:25     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 15:25     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 15:25     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:19   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-13 17:19     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-13 17:19     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-13 17:19     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-14 18:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 18:32     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 18:32     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 18:32     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 18:49     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-14 18:49       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-14 18:49       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-14 18:49       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-19  9:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19 16:39     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-19 16:39       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-19 16:39       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-19 16:39       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-14 19:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 19:08     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 19:08     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-14 19:08     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-15 13:53     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-15 13:53       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-15 13:53       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-15 13:53       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-15 14:39       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-15 14:39         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-15 14:39         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-15 14:39         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 15:22         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 15:22           ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 15:22           ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-17 15:22           ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 18:39           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:39             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:39             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:39             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-19  9:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19 17:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-19 17:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-19 17:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-19 17:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-19 18:33     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-19 18:33       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-19 18:33       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-19 18:33       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-19 19:57       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2021-08-19 19:57         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-19 19:57         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-19 19:57         ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-08-24  7:14       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24  7:14         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24  7:14         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24  7:14         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17  8:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17  8:35     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17  8:35     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17  8:35     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 14:11     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 14:11       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 14:11       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-17 14:11       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 12:38   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-08-17 12:38     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-08-17 12:38     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-08-17 12:38     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-08-19  9:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19  9:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-19 18:34     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-19 18:34       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-19 18:34       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-19 18:34       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has() Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17  9:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17  9:00     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17  9:00     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17  9:00     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 14:46     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 14:46       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 14:46       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-17 14:46       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 18:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:41         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:41         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:41         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 10:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:02     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:02     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:02     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 15:26     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 15:26       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 15:26       ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-17 15:26       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 18:43       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:43         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:43         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 18:43         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 10:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:06     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:06     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:06     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 10:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:24     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 10:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-08-17 15:30       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 15:30         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-17 15:30         ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-17 15:30         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] x86/sev: " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] s390/mm: " Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 16:59   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:22   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-13 17:22   ` Tom Lendacky via iommu
2021-08-13 17:22   ` Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90316f17-e853-fd23-2ec2-4d03cf283b0b@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.