From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
Cc: cw00.choi@samsung.com, tixy@linaro.org, dbasehore@chromium.org,
airlied@linux.ie, mturquette@baylibre.com, typ@rock-chips.com,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, dianders@chromium.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
mark.yao@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] clk: rockchip: add new clock-type for the ddrclk
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:42:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9078133.mu38cJQ6PH@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2163567.7aYA2GN16A@diego>
Am Donnerstag, 4. August 2016, 22:23:05 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Hi Lin,
>
> Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2016, 15:56:56 schrieb Lin Huang:
> > On new rockchip platform(rk3399 etc), there have dcf controller to
> > do ddr frequency scaling, and this controller will implement in
> > arm-trust-firmware. We add a special clock-type to handle that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
>
> please also include the ARM people from last time in your list.
> The arm_smccc_smc calls look correct on first glance, but there is only
> one other example in the kernel [0] outside psci that is using it, so I'd
> like some confirmation that we're doing the right thing :-)
>
>
> [0]
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/mach-artpec/board-artpec6.c
> #L55
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > index bac775d..2e3bccf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > @@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_mmc(const char
> > *name, const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
> >
> > void __iomem *reg, int shift);
> >
> > +struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk(const char *name, int flags,
> > + const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
> > + int mux_offset, int mux_shift, int mux_width,
> > + int mux_flag, int div_shift, int div_width,
> > + int div_flag, void __iomem *reg_base,
> > + spinlock_t *lock);
> > +
> >
> > #define ROCKCHIP_INVERTER_HIWORD_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_inverter(const char *name,
> >
> > @@ -299,6 +306,7 @@ enum rockchip_clk_branch_type {
> >
> > branch_mmc,
> > branch_inverter,
> > branch_factor,
> >
> > + branch_ddrc,
> >
> > };
> >
> > struct rockchip_clk_branch {
> >
> > @@ -488,6 +496,25 @@ struct rockchip_clk_branch {
> >
> > .child = ch, \
> >
> > }
> >
> > +#define COMPOSITE_DDRC(_id, cname, pnames, f, mo, ms, mw, mf, \
> > + ds, dw, df) \
> > + { \
> > + .id = _id, \
> > + .branch_type = branch_ddrc, \
> > + .name = cname, \
> > + .parent_names = pnames, \
> > + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(pnames), \
> > + .flags = f, \
> > + .muxdiv_offset = mo, \
> > + .mux_shift = ms, \
> > + .mux_width = mw, \
> > + .mux_flags = mf, \
> > + .div_shift = ds, \
> > + .div_width = dw, \
> > + .div_flags = df, \
>
> you don't need (nor use) div and mux flags here, please use one flag
> param like the inverter type does and maybe directly add a flag like
> ROCKCHIP_DDRCLK_SIP
> for this type.
>
> Background being, that the ddr clock mechanism is essentially the same
> on all socs and only the method to change the rate varies
> (sip on rk3399, scpi on rk3368, something sram-based on rk3288 and before)
> so in the future, this driver should hopefully be able to carry all those
> different methods.
and maybe name it COMPOSITE_DDRCLK(...)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/7] clk: rockchip: add new clock-type for the ddrclk
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:42:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9078133.mu38cJQ6PH@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2163567.7aYA2GN16A@diego>
Am Donnerstag, 4. August 2016, 22:23:05 schrieb Heiko St?bner:
> Hi Lin,
>
> Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2016, 15:56:56 schrieb Lin Huang:
> > On new rockchip platform(rk3399 etc), there have dcf controller to
> > do ddr frequency scaling, and this controller will implement in
> > arm-trust-firmware. We add a special clock-type to handle that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
>
> please also include the ARM people from last time in your list.
> The arm_smccc_smc calls look correct on first glance, but there is only
> one other example in the kernel [0] outside psci that is using it, so I'd
> like some confirmation that we're doing the right thing :-)
>
>
> [0]
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/mach-artpec/board-artpec6.c
> #L55
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > index bac775d..2e3bccf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h
> > @@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_mmc(const char
> > *name, const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
> >
> > void __iomem *reg, int shift);
> >
> > +struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk(const char *name, int flags,
> > + const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
> > + int mux_offset, int mux_shift, int mux_width,
> > + int mux_flag, int div_shift, int div_width,
> > + int div_flag, void __iomem *reg_base,
> > + spinlock_t *lock);
> > +
> >
> > #define ROCKCHIP_INVERTER_HIWORD_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_inverter(const char *name,
> >
> > @@ -299,6 +306,7 @@ enum rockchip_clk_branch_type {
> >
> > branch_mmc,
> > branch_inverter,
> > branch_factor,
> >
> > + branch_ddrc,
> >
> > };
> >
> > struct rockchip_clk_branch {
> >
> > @@ -488,6 +496,25 @@ struct rockchip_clk_branch {
> >
> > .child = ch, \
> >
> > }
> >
> > +#define COMPOSITE_DDRC(_id, cname, pnames, f, mo, ms, mw, mf, \
> > + ds, dw, df) \
> > + { \
> > + .id = _id, \
> > + .branch_type = branch_ddrc, \
> > + .name = cname, \
> > + .parent_names = pnames, \
> > + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(pnames), \
> > + .flags = f, \
> > + .muxdiv_offset = mo, \
> > + .mux_shift = ms, \
> > + .mux_width = mw, \
> > + .mux_flags = mf, \
> > + .div_shift = ds, \
> > + .div_width = dw, \
> > + .div_flags = df, \
>
> you don't need (nor use) div and mux flags here, please use one flag
> param like the inverter type does and maybe directly add a flag like
> ROCKCHIP_DDRCLK_SIP
> for this type.
>
> Background being, that the ddr clock mechanism is essentially the same
> on all socs and only the method to change the rate varies
> (sip on rk3399, scpi on rk3368, something sram-based on rk3288 and before)
> so in the future, this driver should hopefully be able to carry all those
> different methods.
and maybe name it COMPOSITE_DDRCLK(...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20160729075805epcas1p2fa2fab53fc8cdfdf42f53e99a0a72e6a@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2016-07-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] rk3399 support ddr frequency scaling Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:56 ` Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] clk: rockchip: add clock flag parameter when register pll Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:56 ` Lin Huang
2016-08-04 22:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-08-04 22:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-08-05 8:50 ` hl
2016-08-05 8:50 ` hl
2016-08-05 8:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-08-05 8:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-08-05 8:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-07-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] clk: rockchip: add new clock-type for the ddrclk Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:56 ` Lin Huang
2016-08-04 20:23 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-08-04 20:23 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-08-04 22:42 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2016-08-04 22:42 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-07-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:56 ` Lin Huang
2016-08-04 22:40 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-08-04 22:40 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-08-04 22:40 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-07-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add ddrc clock support Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:56 ` Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] PM / devfreq: event: support rockchip dfi controller Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:56 ` Lin Huang
[not found] ` <1469779021-10426-6-git-send-email-hl-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-01 7:41 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 7:41 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 7:41 ` Chanwoo Choi
[not found] ` <579EFD28.5070404-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-01 8:08 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 8:08 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 8:08 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 8:27 ` hl
2016-08-01 8:27 ` hl
2016-08-01 10:31 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 10:31 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-07-29 7:57 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] PM / devfreq: rockchip: add devfreq driver for rk3399 dmc Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:57 ` Lin Huang
[not found] ` <1469779021-10426-7-git-send-email-hl-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-01 10:28 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 10:28 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 10:28 ` Chanwoo Choi
[not found] ` <579F2445.1020200-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-02 1:03 ` hl
2016-08-02 1:03 ` hl
2016-08-02 1:03 ` hl
2016-08-02 4:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-02 4:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-03 7:38 ` hl
2016-08-03 7:38 ` hl
2016-08-04 0:33 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-04 0:33 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-07-29 7:57 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] drm/rockchip: Add dmc notifier in vop driver Lin Huang
2016-07-29 7:57 ` Lin Huang
[not found] ` <1469779021-10426-1-git-send-email-hl-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-01 7:39 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] rk3399 support ddr frequency scaling Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 7:39 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 7:39 ` Chanwoo Choi
[not found] ` <579EFCBE.4080600-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-01 7:46 ` hl
2016-08-01 7:46 ` hl
2016-08-01 7:46 ` hl
[not found] ` <579EFE64.1000502-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-01 7:50 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 7:50 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-01 7:50 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-05 13:48 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2016-08-05 13:48 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2016-08-05 13:48 ` Tomeu Vizoso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9078133.mu38cJQ6PH@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=dbasehore@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hl@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.yao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=typ@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.