From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
To: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>,
dtrace@lists.linux.dev, dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cg: transition [u]stack() from action to subroutine
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 00:22:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92809454-e92e-73c2-84ae-8d63e792c8a3@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR10MB567238538078DC5066122BECC21DA@SJ0PR10MB5672.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
I don't follow all the details, but I guess this looks fine to me. I
did have a few minor syntactical comments.
It seems that dt_cg_subr_stack() and dt_cg_subr_ustack() are virtually
identical. Might one combine the two functions into a
dt_cg_subr_stack_common() (or whatever name seems suitable) and do this:
static void
dt_cg_subr_stack(dt_node_t *dnp, dt_irlist_t *dlp, dt_regset_t *drp)
{
dt_cg_subr_stack_common(dnp, dlp, drp, DTRACEACT_STACK);
}
static void
dt_cg_subr_ustack(dt_node_t *dnp, dt_irlist_t *dlp, dt_regset_t *drp)
{
dt_cg_subr_stack_common(dnp, dlp, drp, DTRACEACT_USTACK);
}
The win is less the reduction in lines of code and more in the clarity
of what is being done.
Also, a few others sprinkled below...
On 9/23/25 12:01, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_cg.c b/libdtrace/dt_cg.c
> @@ -3987,50 +3996,63 @@ empty_args:
> uint_t nextoff;
> int is_symmod = 0;
>
> - if (dnp->dn_kind == DT_NODE_FUNC &&
> - dnp->dn_ident != NULL)
> - switch (dnp->dn_ident->di_id) {
> - case DT_ACT_STACK:
> - tuplesize = dt_cg_act_stack_sub(yypcb, dnp, treg, tuplesize, DTRACEACT_STACK);
> - continue;
> - case DT_ACT_USTACK:
> - tuplesize = dt_cg_act_stack_sub(yypcb, dnp, treg, tuplesize, DTRACEACT_USTACK);
> - continue;
> - case DT_ACT_UADDR:
> - case DT_ACT_USYM:
> - case DT_ACT_UMOD:
> - nextoff = (tuplesize + (8 - 1)) & ~(8 - 1);
> - if (tuplesize < nextoff)
> - emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, treg, nextoff - tuplesize));
> -
> - /* Preface the value with the user process pid. */
> - if (dt_regset_xalloc_args(drp) == -1)
> - longjmp(yypcb->pcb_jmpbuf, EDT_NOREG);
> - dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> - emit(dlp, BPF_CALL_HELPER(BPF_FUNC_get_current_pid_tgid));
> - dt_regset_free_args(drp);
> - emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_0, 32));
> - emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, treg, 0, BPF_REG_0));
> - dt_regset_free(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> -
> - /* Then store the value. */
> - dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> - emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, areg, -i * DT_STK_SLOT_SZ));
> - emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, treg, 8, BPF_REG_0));
> - dt_regset_free(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> -
> - emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, treg, 16));
> - tuplesize = nextoff + 16;
> -
> - continue;
> - case DT_ACT_SYM:
> - case DT_ACT_MOD:
> - is_symmod = 1;
> - size = 8;
> - dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> - emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, areg, -i * DT_STK_SLOT_SZ));
> - break;
> + if (dnp->dn_kind == DT_NODE_FUNC) {
> + dt_ident_t *fidp = dnp->dn_ident;
> +
> + if (fidp->di_kind == DT_IDENT_FUNC) {
> + switch (fidp->di_id) {
> + case DIF_SUBR_STACK:
> + tuplesize = dt_cg_act_stack_sub(
> + yypcb, dnp, treg,
> + tuplesize,
> + DTRACEACT_STACK);
> + continue;
> + case DIF_SUBR_USTACK:
> + tuplesize = dt_cg_act_stack_sub(
> + yypcb, dnp, treg,
> + tuplesize,
> + DTRACEACT_USTACK);
> + continue;
> + }
> + } else if (fidp->di_kind == DT_IDENT_ACTFUNC) {
> + switch (dnp->dn_ident->di_id) {
s/dnp->dn_ident/fidp/
> + case DT_ACT_UADDR:
> + case DT_ACT_USYM:
> + case DT_ACT_UMOD:
> + nextoff = ALIGN(tuplesize, 8);
> + if (tuplesize < nextoff)
> + emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, treg, nextoff - tuplesize));
> +
> + /* Preface the value with the user process pid. */
> + if (dt_regset_xalloc_args(drp) == -1)
> + longjmp(yypcb->pcb_jmpbuf, EDT_NOREG);
> + dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> + emit(dlp, BPF_CALL_HELPER(BPF_FUNC_get_current_pid_tgid));
> + dt_regset_free_args(drp);
> + emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_0, 32));
> + emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, treg, 0, BPF_REG_0));
> + dt_regset_free(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> +
> + /* Then store the value. */
> + dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> + emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, areg, -i * DT_STK_SLOT_SZ));
> + emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, treg, 8, BPF_REG_0));
> + dt_regset_free(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> +
> + emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, treg, 16));
> + tuplesize = nextoff + 16;
> +
> + continue;
> + case DT_ACT_SYM:
> + case DT_ACT_MOD:
> + is_symmod = 1;
> + size = 8;
> + dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> + emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, areg, -i * DT_STK_SLOT_SZ));
> + break;
> + }
> }
> + }
>
> if (!is_symmod) {
> dt_node_diftype(dtp, dnp, &t);
> @@ -6968,6 +7070,7 @@ dt_cg_call_subr(dt_node_t *dnp, dt_irlist_t *dlp, dt_regset_t *drp)
> assert(idp->di_id <= DIF_SUBR_MAX);
>
> fun = _dt_cg_subr[idp->di_id];
> +assert(fun != NULL);
Weird indentation?
> if (fun == NULL)
> dnerror(dnp, D_FUNC_UNDEF, "unimplemented subroutine: %s\n",
> idp->di_name);
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_open.c b/libdtrace/dt_open.c
> index 509f263d..9dd8956d 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dt_open.c
> +++ b/libdtrace/dt_open.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static const dt_ident_t _dtrace_globals[] = {
> { "ipl", DT_IDENT_SCALAR, 0, DIF_VAR_IPL, DT_ATTR_STABCMN, DT_VERS_1_0,
> &dt_idops_type, "uint_t" },
> { "jstack", DT_IDENT_ACTFUNC, 0, DT_ACT_JSTACK, DT_ATTR_STABCMN, DT_VERS_1_0,
Add DT_IDFLG_ALLOCA? (Of course, it doesn't matter yet.)
> - &dt_idops_func, "stack([uint32_t], [uint32_t])" },
> + &dt_idops_func, "dt_stack([uint32_t], [uint32_t])" },
> { "link_ntop", DT_IDENT_FUNC, 0, DIF_SUBR_LINK_NTOP, DT_ATTR_STABCMN,
> DT_VERS_1_5, &dt_idops_func, "string(int, void *)" },
> { "llquantize", DT_IDENT_AGGFUNC, 0, DT_AGG_LLQUANTIZE,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-29 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 16:01 [PATCH 2/2] cg: transition [u]stack() from action to subroutine Kris Van Hees
2025-09-29 4:22 ` Eugene Loh [this message]
2025-09-29 18:22 ` Kris Van Hees
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92809454-e92e-73c2-84ae-8d63e792c8a3@oracle.com \
--to=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kris.van.hees@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.