From: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
To: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
Cc: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>,
dtrace@lists.linux.dev, dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cg: transition [u]stack() from action to subroutine
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 14:22:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNrOSNsN3AZEvqyh@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92809454-e92e-73c2-84ae-8d63e792c8a3@oracle.com>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 12:22:16AM -0400, Eugene Loh wrote:
> I don't follow all the details, but I guess this looks fine to me. I did
> have a few minor syntactical comments.
>
> It seems that dt_cg_subr_stack() and dt_cg_subr_ustack() are virtually
> identical. Might one combine the two functions into a
> dt_cg_subr_stack_common() (or whatever name seems suitable) and do this:
>
> static void
> dt_cg_subr_stack(dt_node_t *dnp, dt_irlist_t *dlp, dt_regset_t *drp)
> {
> dt_cg_subr_stack_common(dnp, dlp, drp, DTRACEACT_STACK);
> }
>
> static void
> dt_cg_subr_ustack(dt_node_t *dnp, dt_irlist_t *dlp, dt_regset_t *drp)
> {
> dt_cg_subr_stack_common(dnp, dlp, drp, DTRACEACT_USTACK);
> }
>
> The win is less the reduction in lines of code and more in the clarity of
> what is being done.
Sure.
> Also, a few others sprinkled below...
>
> On 9/23/25 12:01, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> > diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_cg.c b/libdtrace/dt_cg.c
> > @@ -3987,50 +3996,63 @@ empty_args:
> > uint_t nextoff;
> > int is_symmod = 0;
> > - if (dnp->dn_kind == DT_NODE_FUNC &&
> > - dnp->dn_ident != NULL)
> > - switch (dnp->dn_ident->di_id) {
> > - case DT_ACT_STACK:
> > - tuplesize = dt_cg_act_stack_sub(yypcb, dnp, treg, tuplesize, DTRACEACT_STACK);
> > - continue;
> > - case DT_ACT_USTACK:
> > - tuplesize = dt_cg_act_stack_sub(yypcb, dnp, treg, tuplesize, DTRACEACT_USTACK);
> > - continue;
> > - case DT_ACT_UADDR:
> > - case DT_ACT_USYM:
> > - case DT_ACT_UMOD:
> > - nextoff = (tuplesize + (8 - 1)) & ~(8 - 1);
> > - if (tuplesize < nextoff)
> > - emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, treg, nextoff - tuplesize));
> > -
> > - /* Preface the value with the user process pid. */
> > - if (dt_regset_xalloc_args(drp) == -1)
> > - longjmp(yypcb->pcb_jmpbuf, EDT_NOREG);
> > - dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > - emit(dlp, BPF_CALL_HELPER(BPF_FUNC_get_current_pid_tgid));
> > - dt_regset_free_args(drp);
> > - emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_0, 32));
> > - emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, treg, 0, BPF_REG_0));
> > - dt_regset_free(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > -
> > - /* Then store the value. */
> > - dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > - emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, areg, -i * DT_STK_SLOT_SZ));
> > - emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, treg, 8, BPF_REG_0));
> > - dt_regset_free(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > -
> > - emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, treg, 16));
> > - tuplesize = nextoff + 16;
> > -
> > - continue;
> > - case DT_ACT_SYM:
> > - case DT_ACT_MOD:
> > - is_symmod = 1;
> > - size = 8;
> > - dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > - emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, areg, -i * DT_STK_SLOT_SZ));
> > - break;
> > + if (dnp->dn_kind == DT_NODE_FUNC) {
> > + dt_ident_t *fidp = dnp->dn_ident;
> > +
> > + if (fidp->di_kind == DT_IDENT_FUNC) {
> > + switch (fidp->di_id) {
> > + case DIF_SUBR_STACK:
> > + tuplesize = dt_cg_act_stack_sub(
> > + yypcb, dnp, treg,
> > + tuplesize,
> > + DTRACEACT_STACK);
> > + continue;
> > + case DIF_SUBR_USTACK:
> > + tuplesize = dt_cg_act_stack_sub(
> > + yypcb, dnp, treg,
> > + tuplesize,
> > + DTRACEACT_USTACK);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + } else if (fidp->di_kind == DT_IDENT_ACTFUNC) {
> > + switch (dnp->dn_ident->di_id) {
>
> s/dnp->dn_ident/fidp/
Thanks.
> > + case DT_ACT_UADDR:
> > + case DT_ACT_USYM:
> > + case DT_ACT_UMOD:
> > + nextoff = ALIGN(tuplesize, 8);
> > + if (tuplesize < nextoff)
> > + emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, treg, nextoff - tuplesize));
> > +
> > + /* Preface the value with the user process pid. */
> > + if (dt_regset_xalloc_args(drp) == -1)
> > + longjmp(yypcb->pcb_jmpbuf, EDT_NOREG);
> > + dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > + emit(dlp, BPF_CALL_HELPER(BPF_FUNC_get_current_pid_tgid));
> > + dt_regset_free_args(drp);
> > + emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_0, 32));
> > + emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, treg, 0, BPF_REG_0));
> > + dt_regset_free(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > +
> > + /* Then store the value. */
> > + dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > + emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, areg, -i * DT_STK_SLOT_SZ));
> > + emit(dlp, BPF_STORE(BPF_DW, treg, 8, BPF_REG_0));
> > + dt_regset_free(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > +
> > + emit(dlp, BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, treg, 16));
> > + tuplesize = nextoff + 16;
> > +
> > + continue;
> > + case DT_ACT_SYM:
> > + case DT_ACT_MOD:
> > + is_symmod = 1;
> > + size = 8;
> > + dt_regset_xalloc(drp, BPF_REG_0);
> > + emit(dlp, BPF_LOAD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, areg, -i * DT_STK_SLOT_SZ));
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> > + }
> > if (!is_symmod) {
> > dt_node_diftype(dtp, dnp, &t);
> > @@ -6968,6 +7070,7 @@ dt_cg_call_subr(dt_node_t *dnp, dt_irlist_t *dlp, dt_regset_t *drp)
> > assert(idp->di_id <= DIF_SUBR_MAX);
> > fun = _dt_cg_subr[idp->di_id];
> > +assert(fun != NULL);
>
> Weird indentation?
I think I added that as debugging. Will remove.
> > if (fun == NULL)
> > dnerror(dnp, D_FUNC_UNDEF, "unimplemented subroutine: %s\n",
> > idp->di_name);
> > diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_open.c b/libdtrace/dt_open.c
> > index 509f263d..9dd8956d 100644
> > --- a/libdtrace/dt_open.c
> > +++ b/libdtrace/dt_open.c
> > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static const dt_ident_t _dtrace_globals[] = {
> > { "ipl", DT_IDENT_SCALAR, 0, DIF_VAR_IPL, DT_ATTR_STABCMN, DT_VERS_1_0,
> > &dt_idops_type, "uint_t" },
> > { "jstack", DT_IDENT_ACTFUNC, 0, DT_ACT_JSTACK, DT_ATTR_STABCMN, DT_VERS_1_0,
>
> Add DT_IDFLG_ALLOCA? (Of course, it doesn't matter yet.)
Ah no, some other changes will make that not even needed because I will be
using the static area for storing stacks rather than allocating a new one for
each invocation.
> > - &dt_idops_func, "stack([uint32_t], [uint32_t])" },
> > + &dt_idops_func, "dt_stack([uint32_t], [uint32_t])" },
> > { "link_ntop", DT_IDENT_FUNC, 0, DIF_SUBR_LINK_NTOP, DT_ATTR_STABCMN,
> > DT_VERS_1_5, &dt_idops_func, "string(int, void *)" },
> > { "llquantize", DT_IDENT_AGGFUNC, 0, DT_AGG_LLQUANTIZE,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-29 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 16:01 [PATCH 2/2] cg: transition [u]stack() from action to subroutine Kris Van Hees
2025-09-29 4:22 ` Eugene Loh
2025-09-29 18:22 ` Kris Van Hees [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNrOSNsN3AZEvqyh@oracle.com \
--to=kris.van.hees@oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.