From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, steved@redhat.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:08:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9534.1157116114@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Your CONFIG_BLOCK patches did a decent job of trashing your
> fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, btw. What's up with that? OK, it's sensible
> for people to work against mainline but the net effect of doing that is to
> create a mess for other people to clean up.
It seems the only problem in my patches is that the file address space
operations have had the sync_pages op removed in a patch in the
disable-block-layer patchset as it's no longer necessary.
However, as I suspect you're applying the block patches *before* the FS-Cache
patches, I can't give you an incremental patch that you can apply after the
other fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, since you need to modify the first patch
(fs-cache-make-kafs-use-fs-cache.patch) to get it to apply at all now.
So, I could issue a revised AFS+FS-Cache patch, would that do? Or would you
rather have a patch that you can apply to the one you already have directly
and modify it in place?
David
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:08:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9534.1157116114@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060831102127.8fb9a24b.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Your CONFIG_BLOCK patches did a decent job of trashing your
> fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, btw. What's up with that? OK, it's sensible
> for people to work against mainline but the net effect of doing that is to
> create a mess for other people to clean up.
It seems the only problem in my patches is that the file address space
operations have had the sync_pages op removed in a patch in the
disable-block-layer patchset as it's no longer necessary.
However, as I suspect you're applying the block patches *before* the FS-Cache
patches, I can't give you an incremental patch that you can apply after the
other fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, since you need to modify the first patch
(fs-cache-make-kafs-use-fs-cache.patch) to get it to apply at all now.
So, I could issue a revised AFS+FS-Cache patch, would that do? Or would you
rather have a patch that you can apply to the one you already have directly
and modify it in place?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-01 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 128+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-30 19:31 [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] David Howells
2006-08-30 19:31 ` David Howells
2006-08-30 19:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] FS-Cache: Provide a filesystem-specific sync'able page bit " David Howells
2006-08-30 19:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] FS-Cache: Generic filesystem caching facility " David Howells
2006-08-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] FS-Cache: Release page->private after failed readahead " David Howells
2006-08-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] FS-Cache: Make kAFS use FS-Cache " David Howells
2006-08-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] NFS: Use local caching " David Howells
2006-08-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] FS-Cache: CacheFiles: ia64: missing copy_page export " David Howells
2006-08-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] FS-Cache: CacheFiles: A cache that backs onto a mounted filesystem " David Howells
2006-08-30 19:52 ` [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing " Andrew Morton
2006-08-30 19:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-30 20:37 ` David Howells
2006-08-30 20:37 ` David Howells
2006-08-30 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-31 9:58 ` David Howells
2006-08-31 9:58 ` David Howells
2006-08-31 17:21 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-31 17:21 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-31 17:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-31 17:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-31 17:42 ` David Howells
2006-08-31 17:42 ` David Howells
2006-08-31 18:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-31 18:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-01 13:08 ` David Howells [this message]
2006-09-01 13:08 ` David Howells
2006-09-01 16:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-01 16:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-01 17:00 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-01 17:00 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-02 2:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 2:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 4:11 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-02 4:11 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-02 5:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-02 5:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-03 6:21 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-03 6:21 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-03 6:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-03 6:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-03 6:43 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-03 6:43 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-03 16:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-03 16:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-04 2:23 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-04 2:23 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-04 5:40 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-02 4:49 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-02 4:49 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-04 11:52 ` David Howells
2006-09-04 11:52 ` David Howells
2006-09-04 11:52 ` David Howells
2006-09-04 11:52 ` David Howells
2006-09-04 13:24 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-04 13:24 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-04 13:46 ` David Howells
2006-09-04 13:46 ` David Howells
2006-09-04 15:00 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-04 15:00 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 4:11 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 4:11 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 4:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 4:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 1:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 1:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 2:55 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 2:55 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 3:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 3:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 4:03 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 4:03 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 4:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 4:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 6:06 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 6:06 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 7:01 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 7:01 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 12:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-06 4:54 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-06 4:54 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 9:40 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 9:40 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 10:20 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 10:20 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 10:37 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 10:37 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 12:20 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 12:20 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 13:38 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 13:38 ` David Howells
2006-09-06 4:58 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-06 4:58 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-06 9:51 ` David Howells
2006-09-06 9:51 ` David Howells
2006-09-06 12:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-06 12:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-06 13:24 ` David Howells
2006-09-06 13:24 ` David Howells
2006-09-07 5:30 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-07 5:30 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-07 6:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-07 6:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-07 7:40 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 9:48 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 9:48 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 10:14 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 9:57 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 9:57 ` David Howells
2006-09-05 12:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 12:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 12:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 13:40 ` David Howells
2006-09-06 10:27 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-06 10:27 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 2:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 3:01 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 3:01 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 4:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 4:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 4:06 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 4:06 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 4:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-09-05 6:45 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 6:45 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 7:07 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-05 7:07 ` Ian Kent
2006-09-04 18:20 ` David Howells
2006-09-04 18:20 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9534.1157116114@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.