Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] dt-bindings: power: Constrain properties for JH7110 PMU

From: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Walker Chen <walker.chen@starfivetech.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] dt-bindings: power: Constrain properties for JH7110 PMU
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 09:38:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95dae9c7-ccf9-8e4b-e99b-b4e4bb62257a@starfivetech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417-ramrod-carpool-cd05b0def1a2@spud>

On 2023/4/18 2:55, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:20:31AM +0800, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/4/12 19:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2023 11:42, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:51:16PM +0800, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2023/4/12 16:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/04/2023 08:47, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>>>>>> When use "starfive,jh7110-pmu-dphy" compatible, do not need the reg and
>>>>>>> interrupts properties.
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>  description: |
>>>>>>>    StarFive JH7110 SoC includes support for multiple power domains which can be
>>>>>>> @@ -17,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>>>    compatible:
>>>>>>>      enum:
>>>>>>>        - starfive,jh7110-pmu
>>>>>>> +      - starfive,jh7110-pmu-dphy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You do here much more than commit msg says.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Isn'y DPHY a phy? Why is it in power?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, I will add more description. This is a power framework used to turn on/off 
>>>>> DPHY. So it in power, not a phy.
>>
>> I found something wrong with my description here, not turn on/off DPHY,
>> is turn on/off DPHY power switch. 
>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps tie it less to its role w/ the phy, and more to do with its
>>>> location, say "jh7110-aon-pmu"?
>>>> There's already "aon"/"sys"/"stg" stuff used in clock-controller and
>>>> syscon compatibles etc.
>>>>
>>>> Krzysztof, what do you think of that? (if you remember the whole
>>>> discussion we previously had about using those identifiers a few weeks
>>>> ago).
>>>
>>> Depends whether this is the same case or not. AFAIR, for AON/SYS/STG
>>> these were blocks with few features, not only clock controller.
>>>
>>> This sounds like just phy. Powering on/off phy is still a job of phy
>>> controller... unless it is a power domain controller.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>
>> So, next version the compatible can be changed to "jh7110-aon-pmu"?
> 
> Hmm, is the dphy the only thing that's power is controlled by registers
> in the aon syscon? I tried looking in the "preliminary" TRM that I have,
> but it's not really got a proper register map so I could not tell.
> 
> If there are, it'd help your case I think Changhuang Liang.

I made a discussion with Walker, We don't use other bit on the visionfive2 
board. And I first naming by function. So I will change to "jh7110-aon-pmu"
next version.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv