All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: "Holzrichter," Bruce <bruce.holzrichter@monster.com>,
	"'esr@thyrsus.com'" <esr@thyrsus.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Maintainers master list?
Date: 26 Jun 2001 16:46:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <993588379.763.0.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0106261602380.23373-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0106261602380.23373-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>

On 26 Jun 2001 16:03:05 -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Holzrichter, Bruce wrote:
> 
> > respect Eric, and all the developers work.  How about starting
> > with a simple MAINTAINERS file maintainer?  Someone to actively
> > follow project developers and contact info?
> 
> That's the best idea I've read so far.
> 
> Any takers?

me.  I took issue with the MAINTAINERS file when Eric brought it up
originally.  However, I don't think drastic measures need to be taken.
I have seen a lot of ideas, including Meta-data in the kernel source.

What I think we need is the simple solution: find a maintainer for the
file, cleanup the current cruft and misinformation, and then actively
work to keep the file current.  I am willing to be this maintainer.

I am not a major "maintainer" in the kernel, but I have and do
contribute.  Thus I think this is a good task for me.  I am willing and
wanting to do this.  Comments?

-- 
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net


  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-26 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-26 17:53 Maintainers master list? Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-26 19:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-26 20:46   ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-06-26 23:10     ` Marc Brekoo
2001-06-27 15:12     ` Jes Sorensen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-27 15:15 Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-22 20:48 Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-22 14:47 Missing help entries in 2.4.6pre5 Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-22 20:00 ` Maintainers master list? Eric S. Raymond
2001-06-22 20:54   ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-22 21:09     ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-06-22 21:19     ` Timur Tabi
2001-06-23 17:39       ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=993588379.763.0.camel@phantasy \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=bruce.holzrichter@monster.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=esr@thyrsus.com \
    --cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.