From: Jes Sorensen <jes@sunsite.dk>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
"Holzrichter," Bruce <bruce.holzrichter@monster.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Maintainers master list?
Date: 27 Jun 2001 17:12:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3bsnac5yl.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0106261602380.23373-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <993588379.763.0.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: Robert Love's message of "26 Jun 2001 16:46:05 -0400"
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Love <rml@tech9.net> writes:
Robert> me. I took issue with the MAINTAINERS file when Eric brought
Robert> it up originally. However, I don't think drastic measures
Robert> need to be taken. I have seen a lot of ideas, including
Robert> Meta-data in the kernel source.
Robert> What I think we need is the simple solution: find a maintainer
Robert> for the file, cleanup the current cruft and misinformation,
Robert> and then actively work to keep the file current. I am willing
Robert> to be this maintainer.
A good place to start would be to write a script that checks the email
addresses listed in there for bounces say every 6 months (not too
often or people will get grumphy). Oh and maybe include the data about
the person so he/she can verify it's ok, maybe this way we can get
forget this meta-data sillyness.
Robert> I am not a major "maintainer" in the kernel, but I have and do
Robert> contribute. Thus I think this is a good task for me. I am
Robert> willing and wanting to do this. Comments?
Well, you'd become the maintainer maintainer. Thats worth a slot in
the MAINTAINERS file ;-)
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-27 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-26 17:53 Maintainers master list? Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-26 19:03 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-26 20:46 ` Robert Love
2001-06-26 23:10 ` Marc Brekoo
2001-06-27 15:12 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-27 15:15 Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-22 20:48 Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-22 14:47 Missing help entries in 2.4.6pre5 Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-22 20:00 ` Maintainers master list? Eric S. Raymond
2001-06-22 20:54 ` Rik van Riel
2001-06-22 21:09 ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-06-22 21:19 ` Timur Tabi
2001-06-23 17:39 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3bsnac5yl.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch \
--to=jes@sunsite.dk \
--cc=bruce.holzrichter@monster.com \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.