From: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet)
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Wu, Bryan" <Bryan.Wu@analog.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3, RFC] misc char dev BKL pushdown
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:25:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9968.1211325938@vena.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 May 2008 19:01:24 EDT." <8bd0f97a0805201601h1b08df6fw3fbf6c58759b07b4@mail.gmail.com>
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> please drop the coreb.c changes from your patch
At a minimum, I would hope such a request would say something like "I've
looked at the driver's locking and am convinced that the BKL is not
needed." Have you done that? There is a certain leap of faith involved
in removing that protection from a driver.
I decided to take a quick look...
- You use spin_lock_irq(&coreb_lock) in a number of places, but you do
not take the lock in the interrupt handler. You also do not take the
lock in coreb_write() or coreb_read(), so those can race with the
interrupt handler, with ioctl(), and with each other.
- coreb_write() and coreb_read() do interruptible waits, but do not
check to see whether they were interrupted. They will, in fact,
continue in their I/O loops after a signal.
- In both functions you have:
unsigned long p = *ppos;
if (p + count > coreb_size)
return -EFAULT;
that calculation can overflow.
- You also do this:
static ssize_t coreb_write(struct file *file, const char *buf, size_t count,
loff_t * ppos)
/* ... */
set_dma_start_addr(CH_MEM_STREAM2_SRC, (unsigned long)buf);
In other words, the DMA is done directly to/from a user-space
address. Maybe that's safe on Blackfin, I don't know...
- I have no idea why some of your functions are using d_inode->i_mutex.
- In coreb_ioctl():
spin_lock_irq(&coreb_lock);
if (coreb_status & COREB_IS_RUNNING) {
retval = -EBUSY;
break;
}
this will exit the function with the spinlock still held and
interrupts disabled.
case CMD_COREB_RESET:
printk(KERN_INFO "Resetting Core B\n");
bfin_write_SICB_SYSCR(bfin_read_SICB_SYSCR() | 0x0080);
break;
You do not acquire the lock here, so this can race against other
ioctl() calls. And ioctl() can race against read() and write().
Registration and such seem reasonable, so I can't come up with a
scenario where loss of BKL protection will create trouble. Given the
other problems there, though, I'll confess to being a bit nervous about
it.
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-14 17:49 [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 18:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 21:00 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:13 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 21:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-14 21:17 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:19 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 13:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-15 14:27 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 15:36 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 10:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 19:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 20:05 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2008-05-14 21:45 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 21:39 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-22 20:20 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 15:44 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-16 15:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-16 16:03 ` [PATCH] kill empty chardev open/release methods Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-16 16:24 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 20:55 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-18 19:46 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-18 19:58 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-16 16:22 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Alan Cox
2008-05-16 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-16 16:43 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-17 21:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-18 20:26 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-19 23:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <200805200111.47275.arnd@arndb.de>
2008-05-19 23:14 ` [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog " Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-20 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 15:47 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2008-05-20 18:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 21:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-22 9:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 9:08 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 8:42 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-19 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/3, RFC] misc char " Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 0:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 0:21 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-20 0:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 8:46 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 23:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-20 23:25 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2008-05-21 16:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-05-19 23:34 ` [PATCH 3/3, RFC] remove BKL from misc_open() Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 15:13 ` [PATCH, RFC] char dev BKL pushdown Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-20 17:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-20 18:51 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-17 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-18 20:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-05-14 22:11 ` [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 13:30 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-15 15:05 ` John Stoffel
2008-05-15 15:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 15:18 ` John Stoffel
2008-05-15 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 8:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-15 14:54 ` Diego Calleja
2008-05-14 21:46 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-14 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-14 22:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-15 20:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-15 20:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-15 21:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-17 0:14 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-05-17 0:37 ` Kevin Winchester
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9968.1211325938@vena.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=Bryan.Wu@analog.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.