From: Michael Rothwell <rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Mike Black <mblack@csihq.com>, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage"
Date: 05 Aug 2001 00:19:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <996985193.982.7.camel@gromit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108040952460.1203-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108040952460.1203-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
On 04 Aug 2001 10:08:56 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Mike Black wrote:
> >
> > I'm testing 2.4.8-pre4 -- MUCH better interactivity behavior now.
>
> Good.. However.. [...] before we get too happy about the interactive thing, let's
> remember that sometimes interactivity comes at the expense of throughput,
> and maybe if we fix the throughput we'll be back where we started.
Could there be both interactive and throughput optimizations, and a way
to choose one or the other at run-time? Or even just at compile time?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Rothwell <rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Mike Black <mblack@csihq.com>, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage"
Date: 05 Aug 2001 00:19:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <996985193.982.7.camel@gromit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108040952460.1203-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
On 04 Aug 2001 10:08:56 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Mike Black wrote:
> >
> > I'm testing 2.4.8-pre4 -- MUCH better interactivity behavior now.
>
> Good.. However.. [...] before we get too happy about the interactive thing, let's
> remember that sometimes interactivity comes at the expense of throughput,
> and maybe if we fix the throughput we'll be back where we started.
Could there be both interactive and throughput optimizations, and a way
to choose one or the other at run-time? Or even just at compile time?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-05 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-03 23:44 [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage" Ben LaHaise
2001-08-03 23:44 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 3:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-04 3:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-04 3:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 3:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 3:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:26 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 3:26 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 3:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 3:34 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 3:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 3:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 4:14 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 4:14 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 4:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 4:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 4:39 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 4:39 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 4:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 4:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 5:13 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 5:13 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-04 5:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 5:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 6:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 6:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 5:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-04 5:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-04 7:13 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 7:13 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 23:28 ` [PATCH] Unlazy activate (was: re "ongoing vm suckage") Daniel Phillips
2001-08-04 14:22 ` [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage" Mike Black
2001-08-04 14:22 ` Mike Black
2001-08-04 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 20:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-08-05 4:19 ` Michael Rothwell [this message]
2001-08-05 4:19 ` Michael Rothwell
2001-08-05 18:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-05 18:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-05 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-05 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-05 20:45 ` arjan
2001-08-06 20:32 ` Rob Landley
2001-08-06 20:32 ` Rob Landley
2001-08-05 15:24 ` Mike Black
2001-08-05 15:24 ` Mike Black
2001-08-05 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-05 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-05 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-05 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-05 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-05 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-04 16:21 ` Mark Hemment
2001-08-04 16:21 ` Mark Hemment
2001-08-07 15:45 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 15:45 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 16:51 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 16:51 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 18:17 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-07 18:17 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-07 18:40 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 18:40 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-07 21:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-07 21:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-07 22:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:11 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-07 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 19:21 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-07 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 23:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 17:26 ` Chris Mason
2001-08-07 18:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-07 18:40 ` Chris Mason
2001-08-07 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-07 20:22 ` Chris Mason
2001-08-08 1:08 ` Theodore Tso
2001-08-08 1:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-08 2:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=996985193.982.7.camel@gromit \
--to=rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us \
--cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mblack@csihq.com \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.