All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts and pretend a lock as been acquired in __timeline_mark_lock().
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:25:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <996e5913-106c-a4bb-61e5-2e1ebe4afc4e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbO8Ie1Nj7XcQPNQ@linutronix.de>


On 10/12/2021 20:44, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This is a revert of commits
>     d67739268cf0e ("drm/i915/gt: Mark up the nested engine-pm timeline lock as irqsafe")
>     6c69a45445af9 ("drm/i915/gt: Mark context->active_count as protected by timeline->mutex")
>     6dcb85a0ad990 ("drm/i915: Hold irq-off for the entire fake lock period")
> 
> The existing code leads to a different behaviour depending on whether
> lockdep is enabled or not. Any following lock that is acquired without
> disabling interrupts (but needs to) will not be noticed by lockdep.
> 
> This it not just a lockdep annotation but is used but an actual mutex_t
> that is properly used as a lock but in case of __timeline_mark_lock()
> lockdep is only told that it is acquired but no lock has been acquired.
> 
> It appears that its purpose is just satisfy the lockdep_assert_held()
> check in intel_context_mark_active(). The other problem with disabling
> interrupts is that on PREEMPT_RT interrupts are also disabled which
> leads to problems for instance later during memory allocation.
> 
> Add a CONTEXT_IS_PARKING bit to intel_engine_cs and set_bit/clear_bit it
> instead of mutex_acquire/mutex_release. Use test_bit in the two
> identified spots which relied on the lockdep annotation.
> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> v1…v2:
>   - Add commit 6dcb85a0ad990 as reference.
>   - Name the bit CONTEXT_IS_PARKING.

Thanks for the tweak;

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

I'll pull it in in a minute.

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h       |  3 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  1 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c     | 38 +------------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h           |  3 +-
>   4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> index 246c37d72cd73..d8c74bbf9aae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> @@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ static inline void intel_context_enter(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   static inline void intel_context_mark_active(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->timeline->mutex);
> +	lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(&ce->timeline->mutex) ||
> +		       test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &ce->flags));
>   	++ce->active_count;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> index 9e0177dc5484e..30cd81ad8911a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct intel_context {
>   #define CONTEXT_LRCA_DIRTY		9
>   #define CONTEXT_GUC_INIT		10
>   #define CONTEXT_PERMA_PIN		11
> +#define CONTEXT_IS_PARKING		12
>   
>   	struct {
>   		u64 timeout_us;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> index a1334b48dde7b..a8a2ad44b7e39 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> @@ -80,39 +80,6 @@ static int __engine_unpark(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
> -
> -static unsigned long __timeline_mark_lock(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> -	mutex_acquire(&ce->timeline->mutex.dep_map, 2, 0, _THIS_IP_);
> -
> -	return flags;
> -}
> -
> -static void __timeline_mark_unlock(struct intel_context *ce,
> -				   unsigned long flags)
> -{
> -	mutex_release(&ce->timeline->mutex.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> -}
> -
> -#else
> -
> -static unsigned long __timeline_mark_lock(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void __timeline_mark_unlock(struct intel_context *ce,
> -				   unsigned long flags)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -#endif /* !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) */
> -
>   static void duration(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
>   {
>   	struct i915_request *rq = to_request(fence);
> @@ -159,7 +126,6 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   {
>   	struct intel_context *ce = engine->kernel_context;
>   	struct i915_request *rq;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>   	bool result = true;
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -214,7 +180,7 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   	 * engine->wakeref.count, we may see the request completion and retire
>   	 * it causing an underflow of the engine->wakeref.
>   	 */
> -	flags = __timeline_mark_lock(ce);
> +	set_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &ce->flags);
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->timeline->active_count) < 0);
>   
>   	rq = __i915_request_create(ce, GFP_NOWAIT);
> @@ -246,7 +212,7 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   
>   	result = false;
>   out_unlock:
> -	__timeline_mark_unlock(ce, flags);
> +	clear_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &ce->flags);
>   	return result;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> index dc359242d1aec..b7fe67405fd32 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ i915_request_timeline(const struct i915_request *rq)
>   {
>   	/* Valid only while the request is being constructed (or retired). */
>   	return rcu_dereference_protected(rq->timeline,
> -					 lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex));
> +					 lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex) ||
> +					 test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &rq->context->flags));
>   }
>   
>   static inline struct i915_gem_context *
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts and pretend a lock as been acquired in __timeline_mark_lock().
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:25:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <996e5913-106c-a4bb-61e5-2e1ebe4afc4e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbO8Ie1Nj7XcQPNQ@linutronix.de>


On 10/12/2021 20:44, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This is a revert of commits
>     d67739268cf0e ("drm/i915/gt: Mark up the nested engine-pm timeline lock as irqsafe")
>     6c69a45445af9 ("drm/i915/gt: Mark context->active_count as protected by timeline->mutex")
>     6dcb85a0ad990 ("drm/i915: Hold irq-off for the entire fake lock period")
> 
> The existing code leads to a different behaviour depending on whether
> lockdep is enabled or not. Any following lock that is acquired without
> disabling interrupts (but needs to) will not be noticed by lockdep.
> 
> This it not just a lockdep annotation but is used but an actual mutex_t
> that is properly used as a lock but in case of __timeline_mark_lock()
> lockdep is only told that it is acquired but no lock has been acquired.
> 
> It appears that its purpose is just satisfy the lockdep_assert_held()
> check in intel_context_mark_active(). The other problem with disabling
> interrupts is that on PREEMPT_RT interrupts are also disabled which
> leads to problems for instance later during memory allocation.
> 
> Add a CONTEXT_IS_PARKING bit to intel_engine_cs and set_bit/clear_bit it
> instead of mutex_acquire/mutex_release. Use test_bit in the two
> identified spots which relied on the lockdep annotation.
> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> v1…v2:
>   - Add commit 6dcb85a0ad990 as reference.
>   - Name the bit CONTEXT_IS_PARKING.

Thanks for the tweak;

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

I'll pull it in in a minute.

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h       |  3 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  1 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c     | 38 +------------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h           |  3 +-
>   4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> index 246c37d72cd73..d8c74bbf9aae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> @@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ static inline void intel_context_enter(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   static inline void intel_context_mark_active(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&ce->timeline->mutex);
> +	lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(&ce->timeline->mutex) ||
> +		       test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &ce->flags));
>   	++ce->active_count;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> index 9e0177dc5484e..30cd81ad8911a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct intel_context {
>   #define CONTEXT_LRCA_DIRTY		9
>   #define CONTEXT_GUC_INIT		10
>   #define CONTEXT_PERMA_PIN		11
> +#define CONTEXT_IS_PARKING		12
>   
>   	struct {
>   		u64 timeout_us;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> index a1334b48dde7b..a8a2ad44b7e39 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> @@ -80,39 +80,6 @@ static int __engine_unpark(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
> -
> -static unsigned long __timeline_mark_lock(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> -	mutex_acquire(&ce->timeline->mutex.dep_map, 2, 0, _THIS_IP_);
> -
> -	return flags;
> -}
> -
> -static void __timeline_mark_unlock(struct intel_context *ce,
> -				   unsigned long flags)
> -{
> -	mutex_release(&ce->timeline->mutex.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> -}
> -
> -#else
> -
> -static unsigned long __timeline_mark_lock(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void __timeline_mark_unlock(struct intel_context *ce,
> -				   unsigned long flags)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -#endif /* !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) */
> -
>   static void duration(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
>   {
>   	struct i915_request *rq = to_request(fence);
> @@ -159,7 +126,6 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   {
>   	struct intel_context *ce = engine->kernel_context;
>   	struct i915_request *rq;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>   	bool result = true;
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -214,7 +180,7 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   	 * engine->wakeref.count, we may see the request completion and retire
>   	 * it causing an underflow of the engine->wakeref.
>   	 */
> -	flags = __timeline_mark_lock(ce);
> +	set_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &ce->flags);
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->timeline->active_count) < 0);
>   
>   	rq = __i915_request_create(ce, GFP_NOWAIT);
> @@ -246,7 +212,7 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   
>   	result = false;
>   out_unlock:
> -	__timeline_mark_unlock(ce, flags);
> +	clear_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &ce->flags);
>   	return result;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> index dc359242d1aec..b7fe67405fd32 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ i915_request_timeline(const struct i915_request *rq)
>   {
>   	/* Valid only while the request is being constructed (or retired). */
>   	return rcu_dereference_protected(rq->timeline,
> -					 lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex));
> +					 lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex) ||
> +					 test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKING, &rq->context->flags));
>   }
>   
>   static inline struct i915_gem_context *
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-18 16:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts and pretend a lock as been acquired in __timeline_mark_lock() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-18 16:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-18 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-11-18 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-18 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-11-19  8:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-11-19 14:58   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-19 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-11-19 16:04   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-11-30 16:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-30 16:33     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-07 18:00     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-12-07 18:00       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-12-08  9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-10 20:44   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-10 20:44     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-13  9:25     ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-12-13  9:25       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-10 21:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts and pretend a lock as been acquired in __timeline_mark_lock(). (rev2) Patchwork
2021-12-10 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-12-10 22:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-11 20:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=996e5913-106c-a4bb-61e5-2e1ebe4afc4e@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.