* ATI frame buffer
@ 2001-08-09 20:37 Louis Garcia
2001-08-09 21:23 ` Steven Walter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Louis Garcia @ 2001-08-09 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Does the ATI rage 128 fb support the radeon chip? If not does a driver
exist for this chip? I'm currently upgrading to have DRM support.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ATI frame buffer
2001-08-09 20:37 ATI frame buffer Louis Garcia
@ 2001-08-09 21:23 ` Steven Walter
2001-08-09 22:12 ` Louis Garcia
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Steven Walter @ 2001-08-09 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Louis Garcia; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:37:29PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote:
>
> Does the ATI rage 128 fb support the radeon chip? If not does a driver
> exist for this chip? I'm currently upgrading to have DRM support.
>
> Thanks.
Yes, there is such a fb driver. aty128
What does that have to do with DRM, however?
--
-Steven
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
-- George Orwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ATI frame buffer
2001-08-09 21:23 ` Steven Walter
@ 2001-08-09 22:12 ` Louis Garcia
2001-08-09 22:25 ` James Simmons
2001-08-09 22:28 ` Steven Walter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Louis Garcia @ 2001-08-09 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Walter; +Cc: linux-kernel
The docs for the aty128fb states that it only supports the Rage128 based
devices. You sure it's also for the radeon?
I currently have an unsupported video card.
Louis
On 09 Aug 2001 16:23:06 -0500, Steven Walter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:37:29PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote:
> >
> > Does the ATI rage 128 fb support the radeon chip? If not does a driver
> > exist for this chip? I'm currently upgrading to have DRM support.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Yes, there is such a fb driver. aty128
>
> What does that have to do with DRM, however?
> --
> -Steven
> In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
> -- George Orwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ATI frame buffer
2001-08-09 22:12 ` Louis Garcia
@ 2001-08-09 22:25 ` James Simmons
2001-08-10 2:59 ` Paul Mundt
2001-08-09 22:28 ` Steven Walter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: James Simmons @ 2001-08-09 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Louis Garcia
Cc: Steven Walter, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Fbdev development list
> The docs for the aty128fb states that it only supports the Rage128 based
> devices. You sure it's also for the radeon?
aty128fb does NOT work for the radeon cards!!! Their is a radeonfb.c
driver out their somewhere. I have seen it before.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ATI frame buffer
2001-08-09 22:25 ` James Simmons
@ 2001-08-10 2:59 ` Paul Mundt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mundt @ 2001-08-10 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Simmons
Cc: Louis Garcia, Steven Walter, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Fbdev development list
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:25:44PM -0700, James Simmons wrote:
> > The docs for the aty128fb states that it only supports the Rage128 based
> > devices. You sure it's also for the radeon?
>
> aty128fb does NOT work for the radeon cards!!! Their is a radeonfb.c
> driver out their somewhere. I have seen it before.
>
There is indeed a radeonfb. It's in Alan's tree, has been for awhile.
Regards,
--
Paul Mundt <lethal@chaoticdreams.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ATI frame buffer
2001-08-09 22:12 ` Louis Garcia
2001-08-09 22:25 ` James Simmons
@ 2001-08-09 22:28 ` Steven Walter
2001-08-09 22:35 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Steven Walter @ 2001-08-09 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Louis Garcia; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 06:12:57PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote:
> The docs for the aty128fb states that it only supports the Rage128 based
> devices. You sure it's also for the radeon?
>
> I currently have an unsupported video card.
>
> Louis
Ohh... I was thinking that the Radeon was a card that used the Rage128
chip.
Nonetheless, you should still be able to use the vesa framebuffer.
--
-Steven
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
-- George Orwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ATI frame buffer
2001-08-09 22:28 ` Steven Walter
@ 2001-08-09 22:35 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-08-09 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Walter; +Cc: Louis Garcia, linux-kernel
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 06:12:57PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote:
> > The docs for the aty128fb states that it only supports the Rage128 based
> > devices. You sure it's also for the radeon?
> > I currently have an unsupported video card.
> > Louis
>
> Ohh... I was thinking that the Radeon was a card that used the Rage128
> chip.
Radeon is a chip of its own - way faster, way neater and with XFree 4.1
direct rendering 3D support
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-10 3:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-08-09 20:37 ATI frame buffer Louis Garcia
2001-08-09 21:23 ` Steven Walter
2001-08-09 22:12 ` Louis Garcia
2001-08-09 22:25 ` James Simmons
2001-08-10 2:59 ` Paul Mundt
2001-08-09 22:28 ` Steven Walter
2001-08-09 22:35 ` Alan Cox
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.